|
Introductory literature
Also see the section 'Tutorial / review articles' on
the Siena applications page.
- Longitudinal network data
-
- Snijders, T.A.B., van de Bunt, G.G., and Steglich, C.E.G. (2010).
Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics.
Social Networks, 32, 44-60.
This is a tutorial.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004.
-
Alberto Caimo and Nial Friel (2014).
Actor-Based Models for Longitudinal Networks. Pp. 9-18 in
Reda Alhajj and Jon Rokne (eds.) Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.
New York: Springer.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_166.
- Tom A.B. Snijders (2005).
Models for Longitudinal Network Data.
Chapter 11 in
P. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.),
Models and methods in social network analysis.
New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215-247.
- Tom A.B. Snijders, 2006.
Statistical Methods for Network Dynamics.
In: S.R. Luchini et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the XLIII Scientific Meeting,
Italian Statistical Society, pp. 281-296. Padova: CLEUP.
(This is an introduction for statistically oriented researchers.)
-
Tom A.B. Snijders (2017) (first edition 2014).
Siena: Statistical Modeling of Longitudinal Network Data. Pp. 1718-1725 in
Reda Alhajj and Jon Rokne (eds.) Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.
New York: Springer.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_312-1.
-
Tom A.B. Snijders and Christian E.G. Steglich (2024) (first edition 2011).
Network Dynamics.
Chapter 34 (pp. 501-512) in John McLevey,
John Scott and Peter J. Carrington (eds.),
The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, 2nd edition. London: Sage, 2024.
- Video presentations
-
- Longitudinal data of networks and behavior
-
- Tom A.B. Snijders, Gerhard G. van de Bunt, and Christian E.G. Steglich (2010).
Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics.
Social Networks, 32, 44-60.
This is a tutorial.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004
- Christian E.G. Steglich, Tom A.B. Snijders, and Michael Pearson (2010).
Dynamic Networks and Behavior: Separating Selection from Influence.
Sociological Methodology, 40, 329-393.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x
- Yuval Kalish (2020). Stochastic Actor-Oriented
Models for the Co-Evolution of Networks and Behavior:
An Introduction and Tutorial.
Organizational Research Methods, 23, 511-534.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428118825300
- Craig Rawlings, Jeffrey A. Smith, James Moody, and Daniel McFarland (2023).
Network Analysis: Integrating Social Network Theory, Method, and Application with R.
Cambridge University Press.
Chapter 15: Social Influence: Coevolution of Networks and Behaviors.
Associated with this book are R tutorials:
here is the tutorial for Chapter 15.
- Tom A.B. Snijders (2009).
Longitudinal Methods of Network Analysis .
Pp. 5998-6013 in
Encyclopedia of Complexity and System Science (editor-in-chief Bob Meyers),
part of the Social Networks section (section editor John Scott), Springer Verlag, 2009.
-
René Veenstra, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Christian Steglich
and Maarten H. W. Van Zalk (2013).
Network-Behavior Dynamics.
Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 399-412.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12070
- More general reviews including actor-oriented models
-
- Per Block, Johan Koskinen, James Hollway, Christian Steglich, and
Christoph Stadtfeld (2017).
Change we can believe in: Comparing longitudinal network models on consistency,
interpretability and predictive power.
Social Networks, 52, 180-191.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.08.001
- Tom Broekel, Pierre-Alexandre Balland, Martijn Burger, and Frank van Oort (2014).
Modeling knowledge networks in economic geography: a discussion of four methods.
The Annals of Regional Science 53, 423-452.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0616-2
- Mark Lubell, John Scholz, Ramiro Berardo, and Garry Robins (2012).
Testing Policy Theory with Statistical Models of Networks.
Policy Studies Journal 40, 351-374.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00457.x
- Garry Robins, Jenny M. Lewis, and Peng Wang (2012).
Statistical Network Analysis for Analyzing Policy Networks.
Policy Studies Journal 40, 375-401.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00458.x
- Tom A.B. Snijders. (2011).
Statistical Models for Social Networks.
Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 129-151.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102709
eprint:
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102709
- Veenstra, R., and Dijkstra, J.K. (2011).
Transformations in Peer Networks. Chapter 7 (pp. 135-154) in
B. Laursen and W.A. Collins (eds.),
Relationship Pathways: From Adolescence to Young Adulthood.
New York: Sage.
- Veenstra, R., and Steglich, C. (2012).
Actor-based model for network and behavior dynamics:
A tool to examine selection and influence processes.
Chapter 34 (pp. 598-618) in B. Laursen, T. D. Little, and N. A. Card (Eds.),
Handbook of developmental research methods. New York: Guilford Press.
- In Chinese
-
- Tom A.B. Snijders (2018) [2011],
. Chinese translation (2018)
for Chongqing University Press
of
Network Dynamics,
Chapter 33 (pp. 501-513) in John Scott and Peter J. Carrington (eds.),
The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: Sage, 2011.
- In Dutch
-
- Huisman, Mark, and Snijders, Tom A.B. (2003), Een stochastisch model voor netwerkevolutie.
Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 58, 182-194.
- In French
-
- In German
-
- In Italian
-
- In Spanish and Catalan
-
- Alejandro Espinosa-Rada (2022).
Modelos estocásticos orientados en el actor utilizando RSiena (I). Guión básico introductorio.
REDES 33.1, 92-99.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.936
- Alejandro Espinosa-Rada (2022).
Modelos estocásticos orientados en el actor utilizando RSiena (II). Formato de los Datos.
REDES 33.1, 100-111.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.937
- Alejandro Espinosa-Rada y Alvaro Uzaheta (2022).
Modelos estocásticos orientados en el actor utilizando RSiena (III): Análisis Descriptivo.
REDES 33.2, 196-202.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.956
- Alvaro Uzaheta y Alejandro Espinosa-Rada (2022).
Modelos estocásticos orientados en el actor utilizando RSiena (IV): Formato de las variables.
REDES 33.2, 203-209.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.957
- Alvaro Uzaheta y Alejandro Espinosa-Rada (2023).
Modelos estocásticos orientados en el actor utilizando RSiena (V): Estimación de un modelo
para la evolución de redes sociales.
REDES 34.1, 119-124.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.989
- Alejandro Espinosa-Rada y Alvaro Uzaheta (2023).
Modelos estocásticos orientados en el actor utilizando RSiena (V): Coevolución de redes sociales
y comportamientos individuales.
REDES 34.1, 125-131.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.988
- Jariego, Isidro Maya, and de Federico de la Rua, Ainhoa (2006),
El analisis dinamico de redes sociales con SIENA.
In: Jose Luis Molina, Agueda Quiroga, Joel Marti, Isidro Maya Jariego,
and Ainhoa de Federico (eds.),
Talleres de autoformacion con progamas informaticos de analisis
de redes sociales,
Bellaterra: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Servei de Publicacions.
- de Federico de la Rua, Ainhoa (2005),
El analisis dinamico de redes sociales con SIENA. Metodo, Discusion y Aplicacion.
Empiria, 10, 151-181.
A preprint is available here.
|
|
Presentations (teaching material)
General
Specific topics
- Christoph Stadtfeld, with Tom Snijders, Marijtje van Duijn, Christian Steglich:
Statistical Power in Longitudinal Network Studies.
- Tom A.B Snijders.
Analysing the dynamics of non-directed networks (version July 2022).
Handout version of the same.
- Tom A.B. Snijders.
Multilevel analysis of network dynamics (version June 2024).
Handout version of the same.
- Tom A.B. Snijders.
Analyzing the Joint Dynamics of Several Networks
(version February 2023)
Handout version of the same.
- Tom A.B. Snijders.
Analysing the dynamics of (ordered) valued networks
(version June 2023)
Handout version of the same.
- Tom A.B. Snijders
Goodness of fit testing in RSiena (version February 2023).
- Tom A.B. Snijders
Maximum Likelihood Estimation in RSiena (version January 2023).
- Tom A.B. Snijders
Coding Effects for RSiena (version January 2023).
- Beyond Homophily,
slides for
Tom A.B. Snijders and Alessandro Lomi (2019).
Beyond Homophily:
Incorporating Actor Variables in Statistical Network Models.
Network Science, 7, 1-19
See below for the abstract.
Associated with this paper is the
script SelectionTables.r
which is available from the
scripts page.
- Tom A.B. Snijders
Multilevel analysis of network dynamics
using sienaBayes (version April, 2024).
- Tom A.B. Snijders
Missing data in RSiena.
- Robert Krause, Multiple Imputation for RSiena,
version January, 2019.
- Robert Krause and Anna Iashina, Multiple Imputation for RSiena - Network and Behavior;
version September, 2019.
|
|
|
Literature with fundamental statistical description of the methods
- Longitudinal network data
-
- Amati, Viviana, Schönenberger, Felix, and Snijders, Tom A.B. (2015).
Estimation of stochastic actor-oriented models for
the evolution of networks by generalized method of moments.
Journal de la Société Française de Statistique,
156, 140-165.
(About estimation by the Generalized Method of Moments in function
sienacpp in RSienaTest.)
- Greenan, Charlotte C., (2015).
Diffusion of Innovations in Dynamic Networks.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 178, 147-166.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12054.
(About diffusion of innovations / event history analysis co-evolving
with a network; implemented by special rate effects, such as totExposure,
for a non-decreasing actor variable.
These special rate effects represent social influence.)
- Huisman, Mark, and Snijders, Tom A.B., (2003).
Statistical
analysis of longitudinal network data with changing composition.
Sociological Methods & Research, 32, 253-287.
(Representing changing composition by the method of joiners
and leavers, implemented using function sienaCompositionChange.)
- Indlekofer, Natalie, and Brandes, Ulrik, (2013).
Relative importance of effects in stochastic actor-oriented models.
Network Science, Vol. 1, Issue 3, 278-304.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/nws.2013.21.
(Relative importance of effects, a kind of effect size;
is implemented in function sienaRI.)
- Koskinen, Johan, and Edling, Christopher (2012).
Modelling the evolution of a bipartite network
- Peer referral in interlocking directorates.
Social Networks, 34, 309-322.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.001.
(Evolution of two-mode networks, obtained by specifying
type='bipartite' in sienaDependent.)
- Joshua A. Lospinoso, Michael Schweinberger, Tom A. B. Snijders and Ruth M. Ripley (2011).
Assessing and accounting for time heterogeneity in stochastic actor oriented models..
Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 5, 147-176.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11634-010-0076-1.
(This test for time heterogeneity is carried out using function
sienaTimeTest.)
- Nynke M. D. Niezink and Tom A. B. Snijders (2017).
Co-evolution of Social Networks and Continuous Actor Attributes.
The Annals of Applied Statistics, 11, 1948-1973.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/17-AOAS1037.
- Nynke M. D. Niezink and Tom A. B. Snijders (2018).
Continuous-Time Modeling of Panel Data with Network Structure.
In: Kees van Montfort, Johan H.L. Oud, and Manuel C. Voelkle (eds),
Continuous Time Modeling in the Behavioral and Related Sciences,
pp. 111-134.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77219-6_5.
- Nynke M. D. Niezink, Tom A. B. Snijders, and Marijtje van Duijn (2019).
No longer discrete:
Modeling the dynamics of social networks and continuous behavior.
Sociological Methodology, 49, 295-340.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0081175019842263
- Schweinberger, M. (2012).
Statistical modeling of network panel data: Goodness of fit.
British Journal of Statistical and Mathematical Psychology, 65, 263-281.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02022.x.
(Develops the score-type test available in function siena07
by using fix=TRUE, test=TRUE in includeEffects.)
-
Snijders, Tom A. B. (1995).
Methods for Longitudinal Social Network Data: Review and Markov Process Models.
Pages 211-227 of: E.Tiit, Kollo, T., and Niemi, H. (eds),
New Trends in Probability and Statistics.
Vol. 3: Multivariate Statistics and Matrices in Statistics.
Proceedings of the 5th Tartu Conference. Lithuania: TEV Vilnius.
(Published conference paper, leading to Snijders (1996) (see below).
The very first paper about the stochastic actor-oriented model.)
-
Snijders, Tom A.B. (1996)
Stochastic actor-oriented models for network change.
Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21, 149-172.
(This paper is a precursor: it is about a method not implemented in SIENA,
but along the same lines, for data in the form of ranks.)
- Snijders, Tom A.B. (2001).
The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics.
Sociological Methodology, 31, 361-395.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00099.
(The basic introduction of the Stochastic Actor-Oriented Model.)
- Snijders, Tom A.B. (2004).
Explained Variation in Dynamic Network Models.
Mathematiques, Informatique et Sciences Humaines /
Mathematics and Social Sciences, 168, 2004(4), p. 31-41.
(Introduces an entropy-based measure of explained variation/effect size,
available using function sienaRI.)
- Snijders, Tom A.B. (2013).
Variance Reduction in the Robbins-Monro procedure in RSiena.
Paper presented at the 9th UKSNA Conference,
Greenwich, June 27-28, 2013.
(Explains variance reduction by regression of the simulated statistics
on the scores, and by the partial diagonalization of the approximate
Jacobian. These are the 'dolby' and 'diagonalize' options
in siena07. Shows, for some simulation examples,
the improvement in results of siena07.)
- Tom A.B. Snijders. (2017).
Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models for Network Dynamics.
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 4, 343-363.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054035
Here is the e-print access to this article.
(General overview from a statistical point of view.)
- Snijders, Tom A.B., Koskinen, Johan, and Schweinberger, Michael (2010).
Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Social Network Dynamics.
Annals of Applied Statistics 4, 567-588.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/09-AOAS313.
arXiv:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1753.
(Explains the maximum likelihood procedure available in siena07,
used when maxlike=TRUE is specified in sienaAlgorithmCreate.)
- Snijders, Tom A.B. and Pickup, Mark (2017).
Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models for Network Dynamics.
Pp. 221-247 in
Oxford Handbook of Political Networks, edited by
Jennifer Nicoll Victor, Alexander H. Montgomery, and Mark Lubell.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190228217.013.10.
Also available in
OUP Handbooks-online.
(Gives a general introduction, and also explains the Stochastic Actor-Oriented
Model for non-directed networks.)
- Snijders, Tom A.B. and Van Duijn, Marijtje A.J. (1997).
Simulation for statistical inference in dynamic network models.
In: Conte, R., Hegselmann, R. Terna, P. (eds.),
Simulating social phenomena , 493-512. Berlin: Springer.
(Published conference paper, the first publication about the
Stochastic Actor-Oriented Model for binary networks.)
- Longitudinal data of networks and behavior
-
|
|
|
|
Further literature about special topics
- Longitudinal network data
-
- jimi Adams and David Schaefer (2018).
Visualizing Stochastic Actor-based Model Microsteps.
Socius, "Sociological Research for a Dynamic World", Sage Publications.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118816545
This visualization provides a dynamic representation of the microsteps
involved in modeling network and behavior change with a stochastic
actor-based model.
See the
script for executing this at the Siena scripts page.
- Per Block, James Hollway, Christoph Stadtfeld, Johan Koskinen and Tom Snijders (2022).
Circular specifications and "predicting" with information
from the future: Errors in the empirical SAOM-TERGM
comparison of Leifeld & Cranmer.
Network Science, 10, 3-14.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2022.6
- Per Block, Christoph Stadtfeld, and Tom A. B. Snijders (2019).
Forms of Dependence: Comparing SAOMs and ERGMs From Basic Principles.
Sociological Methods & Research, 48, 202-239.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124116672680
- Koskinen, Johan H., and Snijders, Tom A.B., (2007).
Bayesian inference for dynamic social network data.
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 137 (2007), 3930-3938.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2007.04.011.
- Lars Leszczensky, Harald Beier, Hanno Kruse and Sebastian Pink (2016).
Collecting network panel data in schools: Practical guidance based on
the experiences of three German research projects.
http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/publications/wp/wp-166.pdf
- Jürgen Lerner, Natalie Indlekofer, Bobo Nick, and Ulrik Brandes (2013).
Conditional independence in dynamic networks.
Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 57, 275-283.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.03.002.
Compares conditional independence models with Temporal Exponential
Random Graph models and Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models.
"Our results suggest that conditional independence models are inappropriate
as a general model for network evolution and can lead to distorted substantive
findings on structural network effects, such as transitivity.
On the other hand, the conditional independence
assumption becomes less severe when inter-observation times are relatively short."
- Josh A. Lospinoso and Tom A. B. Snijders (2019).
Goodness of fit for Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models.
Methodological Innovations, 12, 2059799119884282.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799119884282.
The theoretical basis for the sienaGOF function.
- Schweinberger, Michael, and Snijders, Tom A.B., (2007).
Markov models for digraph panel data: Monte Carlo-based
derivative estimation.
Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51, 4465-4483.
The theoretical basis for the estimation of standard errors,
based on the score function.
- Schweinberger, Michael (2020).
Statistical inference for continuous-time Markov processes with block structure
based on discrete-time network data.
Statistica Neerlandica 74, 342-362.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/stan.12196
This method is not contained in the RSiena package.
It is implemented in an extended version of the earlier Delphi code in
Siena 3, available from the author's website.
- Snijders, Tom A.B (2003).
Accounting for Degree Distributions
in Empirical Analysis of Network Dynamics.
Pp. 146-161 in: R. Breiger, K. Carley, and P. Pattison (eds.),
Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers.
National Research Council of the National Academies.
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
This is about an alternative model for network evolution which gives
more flexibility in modeling the distribution of the out-degrees.
- Snijders, Tom A.B. (2011).
Statistical models for dynamics of social networks:
inference and applications.
Proceedings,
58th Congress of the International
Statistical Institute, Dublin, August 21-26, 2011.
The general actor-oriented model is explained, and
an application is given to the like and dislike relation
in Sampson's monastery data: this is a signed graph
represented here as a multivariate relation,
of which one relation is positive and the other negative.
- Tom A.B. Snijders and Frank Kalter (2020).
Religious diversity and social cohesion in German classrooms;
A micro-macro study based on empirical simulations.
In:
Advances in the sociology of trust and cooperation;
Theory, experiments, and field studies,
edited by Vincent Buskens, Rense Corten, and Chris Snijders; De Gruyter.
Open Access: PDF ISBN 978-3-11-064749-5, EPUB ISBN 978-3-11-064761-7.
Publication date: October, 2020.
This chapter proposes an integrated statistical approach to studying
the micro-macro transition by combining a random coefficient multilevel
approach with the Stochastic Actor-Oriented Model.
This is elaborated for the substantively interesting and topical
question whether the growing ethnic and religious
diversity in our societies, along with the well-known tendency
for homophily, necessarily lead to a decline in social cohesion.
- Tom A.B. Snijders and Alessandro Lomi (2019).
Beyond Homophily:
Incorporating Actor Variables in Statistical Network Models.
Network Science, 7, 1-19.
Next to homophily, three other mechanisms are discussed that may play
a role in how numerical actor attributes affect directed social networks:
aspiration, conformity, and sociability. A four-parameter specification
is proposed for the effects of numerical actor attributes on directed
social networks.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/nws.2018.30
See slides above;
associated with this paper is the
script SelectionTables.r
which is available from the
scripts page.
- Tom A.B. Snijders and Christian E.G. Steglich (2015).
Representing Micro-Macro Linkages by Actor-Based Dynamic Network Models.
Sociological Methods & Research, 44, 222-271.
Elaborates the relation between stochastic actor-oriented models
and agent-based simulation models.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124113494573
- Christian E.G. Steglich and Tom A.B. Snijders (2022).
Stochastic network modeling as generative social science.
Chapter 5 (p. 73-99) in
Handbook of Sociological Science; Contributions to Rigorous Sociology,
Edited by Klarita Gërxhani, Nan de Graaf, and Werner Raub.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Online.
This chapter gives an overview of the stochastic actor-oriented model that can be used
for the statistical analysis of the dynamics of networks and more general structures.
This model is employed in a principled method of empirically anchoring
social simulation studies. In particular, the chapter
addresses the problem of holding micro-level mechanisms of network change
accountable for the emergence of macro-level network properties.
- Veenstra, R., Bertogna, T., and Laninga-Wijnen, L. (2024).
The growth of longitudinal social network analysis:
A review of the key data sets and topics in research on
child and adolescent development.
In M. E. Feinberg and D. W. Osgood (Eds.),
Teen Friendship Networks, Development, and Risky Behavior
(pp. 326-352). Oxford University Press.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197602317.003.0014
- Design of longitudinal network studies, causality issues
-
- Eugene Ang, Prasanta Bhattacharya, and Andrew Lim (2023).
Estimating Policy Effects in a Social Network with Independent Set Sampling.
arXiv:2306.14142.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.14142.
From the abstract:
(...) we propose a modeling strategy that combines existing work on stochastic
actor-oriented models (SAOM) and diffusion contagion models with a novel network
sampling method based on the identification of independent sets. (...)
our method allows for the estimation of both the direct as well as the net effect
of a chosen policy intervention,
in the presence of network effects in the population. (...)
- Design of longitudinal network studies, power issues
-
- Longitudinal data of networks and behavior
-
- Dynamic Exponential Random Graph Models
-
- Tom Snijders and Johan Koskinen, Longitudinal Models.
Chapter 11 (pp. 130-140) in
Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks,
D. Lusher, J. Koskinen, and G. Robins (eds.),
Cambridge University Press, 2013.
- Co-evolution of multiple networks
-
- Tom A.B. Snijders, Alessandro Lomi, and Vanina Jasmine Torló (2013).
A model for the multiplex dynamics of two-mode and one-mode networks,
with an application to employment preference, friendship, and advice.
Social Networks, 35, 265-276.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.05.005.
In Figure 2, Y_{ia} and Y_{ja} should be interchanged.
This paper presents stochastic actor-oriented models
for one-mode / two-mode network coevolution.
- Kayo Fujimoto, Tom A.B. Snijders, and Thomas W. Valente (2018).
Multivariate dynamics of one-mode and two-mode networks: Explaining similarity
in sports participation among friends. Network Science, 6, 370-395.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/nws.2018.11
This paper furter develops modeling of one-mode / two-mode network coevolution,
applied to the dynamic interplay between the two-mode affiliation network of
adolescents' participation in sports activities and the one-mode friendship network.
Methodologically it is about the two mechanisms for mixed transitive closure:
affiliation-based focal closure, where individuals participating in the same sport
become (or stay) friends; and association-based affiliation closure, where
individuals start (or continue) participating in the sports in which their friends
are already active.
As a corresponding descriptive method generalizing the 'pie charts' of Steglich et al. (2010),
we propose a quantitative measure for the relative strength of these two mechanisms as explanations
of the association between the one-mode and the two-mode network.
A further methodological issue is that two specifications are
given to represent homophily effects in the two-mode network.
- Missing data
-
- Kayla de la Haye, Joshua Embree, Marc Punkay, Dorothy L. Espelage,
Joan S. Tucker, and Harold D. Green Jr. (2017).
Analytic strategies for longitudinal networks with missing data.
Social Networks, 50, 17-25.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.02.001
Proposes a strategy for dealing with varying actors subsets having missing data.
The strategy is based on the multiple groups option.
- Hipp, J.R., Wang, C., Butts, C.T., Jose, R., Lakon, C.M. (2015).
Research note: the consequences of different methods for handling
missing network data in stochastic actor based models.
Social Networks 41, 56-71.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.12.004.
Note
This paper presents a method for handling missing data in longitudinal
network modeling that is better than the simple method employed in RSiena.
However, the method in RSiena is not as poor as these authors suggest.
The paper misrepresents details of the way in which RSiena handles missing data.
The writing suggests that the 'third strategy' mentioned on p. 57 is
the strategy employed by RSiena. This is not the case, because although
RSiena uses the imputation strategy as described here, it also excludes
the tie and behavior variables for which a data values is missing
at a wave and/or a preceding wave from the calculation of the
target statistics for this wave. Thus, the effect of the imputation
is minimized.
See Huisman and Steglich (2008, Section 4.4), and the RSiena Manual,
Section 4.3.2.
- Huisman, Mark, and Steglich, C.E.G., (2008).
Treatment of non-response in longitudinal network data.
Social Networks, 30, 297-308.
- Robert W. Krause, Mark Huisman, and Tom A.B. Snijders (2018).
Multiple imputation for longitudinal network data.
Italian Journal of Applied Statistics, 30, 33-57.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26398/IJAS.0030-002.
Missing data on network ties are a fundamental problem for network analysis.
In this paper, we present a new method with two variants to handle missing data
due to actor non-response in the framework of stochastic actor-oriented models (SAOMs).
The proposed method imputes missing tie variables in the first wave either by
using a Bayesian exponential random graph model (BERGMs) or a stationary SAOM
and imputes missing tie variables in later waves utilizing a SAOM.
The proposed method is compared to the standard SAOM missing data treatment
as well as recently proposed methods.
The multiple imputation procedure provided more reliable point estimates than the default treatment.
A script for this paper, and another one for related missing data issues,
is at the Siena scripts page.
- Cheng Wang, Carter T. Butts, John R. Hipp, Rupa Jose,
and Cynthia M. Lakon (2016).
Multiple imputation for missing edge data:
A predictive evaluation method with application to Add Health.
Social Networks 45, 89-98.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.12.003.
Note
See the note about the paper by Hipp et al. (2015), a few lines up.
This paper likewise misrepresents the way in which RSiena handles missing data.
The phrase 'it simply drops them or treats them as absent'
(p. 95) is incorrect: the imputation used in RSiena by 'last observation carried
forward' is somewhat more informative than this, and the exclusion
of the imputed data from the target statistics means that 'simply'
is not applicable. Further, 'As Hipp et al. (2015) found' is incorrect,
because Hipp et al. (2015) used a different imputation strategy
in their comparisons, as mentioned above.
- Tjeerd Zandberg and Mark Huisman (2019).
Missing behavior data in longitudinal network studies:
The impact of treatment methods on estimated effect parameters in stochastic
actor oriented models.
Social Network Analysis and Mining, 9.8.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0553-2.
This paper examines seven different methods that are currently available
to deal with missing behavior data.
The effect of the missing data methods was inspected using three criteria:
model convergence, parameter bias, and parameter coverage.
The results show that, in general, the default method available in the
RSIENA software gives the best outcomes for all three criteria.
- Maximum likelihood estimation
-
- Visualization
-
- Ulrik Brandes, Natalie Indlekofer, and Martin Mader (2012).
Visualization methods for longitudinal social networks and stochastic actor-oriented modeling.
Social Networks, 34, 291-308.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.06.002.
- Multilevel dynamic network analysis and meta-analysis of network dynamics
-
- Nick Crossley, Elisa Bellotti, Gemma Edwards, Martin G. Everett,
Johan Koskinen and Mark Tranmer (2015).
Social Network Analysis for Ego-Nets. London: Sage.
See p. 171-177 for a concise treatment of the use of Siena for the analysis
of longitudinal observations of multiple ego networks.
-
Tom A.B. Snijders and Chris Baerveldt,
A Multilevel Network Study of the Effects
of Delinquent Behavior on Friendship Evolution.
Journal of Mathematical Sociology 27 (2003), 123-151.
This is about a 'multilevel' or 'meta-analysis' extension of this longitudinal method to the case
of observations on several networks.
It is implemented in the function siena08()
(see the script RscriptMultipleGroups.R on the
RSiena scripts page).
A set of transparencies explaining this method
(revised version, December 2013)
can be downloaded here.
The data are available from the
Siena data sets page.
- Tom A.B. Snijders (2016),
The Multiple Flavours of Multilevel Issues for Networks.
Chapter 2 in Emmanuel Lazega and Tom A.B. Snijders (eds.),
Multilevel Network Analysis for the Social Sciences,
Cham: Springer, 2016.
ISBN 978-3-319-24518-8 ISBN 978-3-319-24520-1 (eBook)
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24520-1
- Tom A.B. Snijders, Malick Faye, and Julien Brailly (2020).
Network dynamics with a nested node set: Sociability in seven villages in Senegal.
Statistica Neerlandica 74, 300-323.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/stan.12208
From the abstract:
We propose two complementary ways to deal with a
nesting structure in the node set of a network; such
a structure may be called a multilevel network, with a
node set consisting of several groups. First, within-group
ties are distinguished from between-group ties by considering
them as two distinct but interrelated networks.
Second, effects of nodal variables are differentiated
according to the levels of the nesting structure, to prevent
ecological fallacies.
- Johan Koskinen and Tom A.B. Snijders (2023).
Multilevel longitudinal analysis of social networks.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 186, 376–400.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnac009
This is an explanation of the statistical theory behind the sienaBayes function
for multilevel longitudinal network analysis.
It also presents an example of one-mode - two-mode network coevolution.
- Weihua (Edward) An (2015).
Multilevel meta network analysis with application to studying network
dynamics of network interventions.
Social Networks, 43, 48-56.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.03.006.
See notes about this paper at the
News page.
|
|
|
|
Literature about further applications can be found at the
webpage with applications.
|
 |
|
|
 |
Back to the main Siena page
|
 |
|