Back to the main Siena page

Applications of Siena



Next to the illustrations in the methodological articles, applications of Siena can be found in the following articles.



Articles about dynamics of networks (see below for dynamics of multivariate networks).

   Tutorial / review articles

  • David N. Fisher, Amiyaal Ilany, Matthew J. Silk and Tom Tregenza (2017). Analysing animal social network dynamics: the potential of stochastic actor-oriented models. Journal of Animal Ecology, 86, 202-212.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12630.
  • Tom A.B. Snijders, Gerhard G. van de Bunt, and Christian E.G. Steglich (2010). Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44-60.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004
  • Ralf Wölfer, Nadira S. Faber, and Miles Hewstone (2015). Social network analysis in the science of groups: Cross-sectional and longitudinal applications for studying intra-and intergroup behavior. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19, 45-61.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000021

   Research articles


Articles about dynamics of personal networks.
  • Miranda J. Lubbers, Jose Luis Molina, Jurgen Lerner, Ulrik Brandes, Javier Avila, Christopher McCarty (2010). Longitudinal analysis of personal networks. The case of Argentinean migrants in Spain. Social Networks, 32, 91-104.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.05.001.




Articles about dynamics of networks and behavior.

   Tutorial / review articles

   Meta-analyses of Siena results

   Special issue

   Research articles

  • jimi adams and David R. Schaefer (2016). How Initial Prevalence Moderates Network-based Smoking Change: Estimating Contextual Effects with Stochastic Actor-based Models . Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 57, 22-38.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022146515627848
  • Filip Agneessens and Rafael Wittek, (2008), Social capital and employee well-being: disentangling intrapersonal and interpersonal selection and influence mechanisms. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49, 613-637.
  • Yoshiyuki Arata, Abhijit Chakraborty, Yoshi Fujiwara, Hiroyasu Inoue, Hazem Krichene and Masaaki Terai (2018). Shock Propagation Through Customer-Supplier Relationships: An Application of the Stochastic Actor-Oriented Model. International Workshop on Complex Networks and their Applications, 1100-1110.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72150-7_89
  • Laura Baams, Geertjan Overbeek, Daphne van de Bongardt, Ellen Reitz, Judith Semon Dubas, Marcel van Aken (2015). Adolescents' and their friends' sexual behavior and intention: Selection effects of personality dimensions. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 2-12.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.009.
  • Chris Baerveldt, Beate Völker, and Ronan Van Rossem (2008). Revisiting selection and influence: an inquiry into the friendship networks of high school students and their association with delinquency. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 50, 559-587.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.50.5.559.
    (Note: the quadratic shape function may have been mistakenly omitted from the specification of the behavior objective function in the analyses reported here.)
  • Richard A. Benton (2016). Corporate governance and nested authority: Cohesive network structure, actor-driven mechanisms, and the balance of power in American corporations. American Journal of Sociology, 122, 661-713.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/689397

    Note: this article contains a study of the co-evolution of a two-mode network (firms by directors) and 'behavior' (governance index).

  • Ramiro Berardo and John T. Scholz, (2010), Self-Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection and Cooperation in Estuaries. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 632-649.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.x.
  • Christian Berger, Mariola C. Gremmen, Diego Palacios and Eduardo Franco (2019). "Would you be my friend?": Friendship selection and contagion processes of early adolescents who experience victimization. The Journal of Early Adolescence, in press.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618824753

  • Richard A. Brenton (2016). Corporate Governance and Nested Authority: Cohesive Network Structure, Actor-Driven Mechanisms, and the Balance of Power in American Corporations. American Journal of Sociology, 122, 661-713.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/689397.
  • Meg Bruening, Irene van Woerden, David R. Schaefer, Daniel Hruschka, Alexandra Brewis, Corrie M. Whisner, Genevieve F. Dunton, Michael Todd, Punam Ohri-Vachaspati and Melissa N. Laska (2018). Friendship as a social mechanism influencing body mass index (BMI) among emerging adults. PLOS ONE, 13(12), e0208894.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208894

  • William J. Burk, Margaret Kerr, and Håkan Stattin (2008), The co-evolution of early adolescent friendship networks, school involvement, and delinquent behaviors. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49, 499-522.
  • Burk, William J., Steglich, Christian E.G., and Snijders, Tom A.B. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 397-404.
  • Tobias Buchmann and Andreas Pyka (2015). The evolution of innovation networks: the case of a publicly funded German automotive network. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 24, 114-139.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.897860.
  • Burk, W.J., Van der Vorst, H., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2012). Alcohol intoxication frequency and friendship dynamics: Selection and socialization in early, mid- and late adolescent peer networks. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 89-98.
  • Caravita, S.C.S., Sijtsema, J.J., Rambaran, J.A., and Gini, G. (2014). Peer Influences on Moral Disengagement in Late Childhood and Early Adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(2), 193-207.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9953-1.
  • Matthew Checkley, Christian Steglich, Duncan Angwin, and Richard Endersby (2014). Firm Performance and the Evolution of Cooperative Interfirm Networks: UK Venture Capital Syndication. Strategic Change, 23, 107-118.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsc.1963.
  • Angela Chow, Noona Kiuru, Philip D. Parker, Jacquelynne C. Eccles and Katariina Salmela-Aro (2018). Development of friendship and task values in a new school: Friend selection for the arts and physical education but socialization for academic subjects. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1966-1977.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0894-6
  • Viktor Dahl and Maarten van Zalk (2014). Peer Networks and the Development of Illegal Political Behavior Among Adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24, 399-409.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12072.
  • Joao R. Daniel, Antonio J. Santos, Carla Fernandes and Brian E. Vaughn (2019). Network dynamics of affiliative ties in preschool peer groups. Social Networks, 57, 63-69.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.12.005

  • Dawn DeLay, Brett Laursen, Noona Kiuru, Katariina Salmela-Aro and Jari-Erik Nurmi (2013). Selecting and Retaining Friends on the Basis of Cigarette Smoking Similarity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 464-473.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12017.
  • Maurits de Klepper, Ed Sleebos, Gerhard van de Bunt, and Filip Agneessens (2010). Similarity in friendship networks: Selection or influence? The effect of constraining contexts and non-visible individual attributes. Social Networks, 32, 82-90.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.06.003
  • Maurits de Klepper, Giuseppe (Joe) Labianca, Ed Sleebos, and Filip Agneessens (2017). Sociometric Status and Peer Control Attempts: A Multiple Status Hierarchies Approach. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 1-31.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joms.12242
  • Kayla de la Haye, Garry Robins, Philip Mohr, and Carlene Wilson (2011). Homophily and Contagion as Explanations for Weight Similarities Among Adolescent Friends. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49, 421-427.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.02.008
  • Kayla de la Haye, Garry Robins, Philip Mohr, and Carlene Wilson (2011). How physical activity shapes, and is shaped by, adolescent friendships. Social Science and Medicine, 73, 719-728.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.023
  • Kayla de la Haye, Harold D. Green Jr., David P. Kennedy, Michael S. Pollard and Joan S. Tucker (2013). Selection and Influence Mechanisms Associated With Marijuana Initiation and Use in Adolescent Friendship Networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 474-486.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12018
  • Kayla de la Haye, Harold D. Green Jr., Michael S. Pollard, David P. Kennedy, and Joan S. Tucker (2015). Befriending risky peers: Factors driving adolescents' selection of friends with similar marijuana use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 1914-1928.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0210-z
  • Kayla de la Haye, Garry Robins, Philip Mohr and Carlene Wilson (2013). Adolescents' Intake of Junk Food: Processes and Mechanisms Driving Consumption Similarities Among Friends. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 524-536.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12045
  • Dawn DeLay, Laura D. Hanish, Linlin Zhang and Carol L. Martin (2016). Assessing the Impact of Homophobic Name Calling on Early Adolescent Mental Health: A Longitudinal Social Network Analysis of Competing Peer Influence Effects. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 955-969.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0598-8
  • Dawn DeLay, Carol Lynn Martin, Rachel E. Cook and Laura D. Hanish (2018). The Influence of Peers During Adolescence: Does Homophobic Name Calling by Peers Change Gender Identity? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 636-649.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0749-6
  • Julio Díaz-José, Roberto Rendón-Medel, Jorge Aguilar-Ávila, Manrrubio Muñoz-Rodríguez (2013). Dynamic analysis of networks in the diffusion of agricultural innovations Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 4(7), 1095-1102.
    This article was published simultaneously in an English and a Spanish version.
  • Sara E. Dieterich (2015). The Coevolution of Adolescent Friendship Networks and School Outcomes. PhD dissertation, Department of Psychology, Colorado State University.
  • Jan K. Dijkstra and Christian Berger (2017). Friendship Selection and Influence Processes for Physical Aggression and Prosociality: Differences between Single-Sex and Mixed-Sex Contexts. Sex Roles, 78, 625-636.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0818-z
  • Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Christian Berger, and Siegwart Lindenberg (2011). Do physical and relational aggression explain adolescents' friendship selection? The competing roles of network characteristics, gender, and social status. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 1-13.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.20402
  • Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Antonius H.N. Cillessen, and Casey Borch (2013). Popularity and Adolescent Friendship Networks: Selection and Influence Dynamics. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1242-1252.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030098
  • Dijkstra, J.K., Gest, S.D., Lindenberg, S., Veenstra, R., and Cillessen, A.H.N. (2012). The emergence of weapon carrying in peer context. Testing three explanations: the role of aggression, victimization, and friends. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 371-376.
    DOI: " http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.08.010
  • Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., Veenstra, R., Steglich, C., Isaacs, J., Card, N. A. and Hodges, E. V. E. (2010). Influence and selection processes in weapon carrying during adolescence: The roles of status, aggression, and vulnerability. Criminology, 48, 187-220.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00183.x
  • Dan Ding, Tuan Q. Phan, Prasanta Bhattacharya and Xuesong Lu (2018). The impact of peer influence on academic performance: A three-stage co-evolution model. Thirty ninth International Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco 2018
    https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1097&context=icis2018

  • Thomas J. Dishion (2013). Stochastic Agent-Based Modeling of Influence and Selection in Adolescence: Current Status and Future Directions in Understanding the Dynamics of Peer Contagion. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 596-603.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12068
  • Sofia Dokuka, Diliara Valeeva, and Maria Yudkevich (2015). The Diffusion of Academic Achievements: Social Selection and Influence in Student Networks. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 65/SOC/2015. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2658031 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2658031.
  • Bart Duriez, Matteo Giletta, Peter Kuppens, and Maarten Vansteenkiste (2013). Extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits and peer dynamics: Selection and influence processes among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 925-933.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.07.009
  • Joris J. Ebbers and Nachoem M. Wijnberg (2018). The co-evolution of social networks and selection system orientations as core constituents of institutional logics of future entrepreneurs at school. Journal of Business Venturing, 34, 558-577.
    DOI: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088390261830051X
  • Cécile Emery (2012). Uncovering the role of emotional abilities in leadership emergence. A longitudinal analysis of leadership networks. Social Networks,34, 429-437
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.02.001
  • Cécile Emery, Kim Daniloski, and Anne Hamby (2011). The reciprocal effects of self-view as a leader and leadership emergence. Small Group Research, 42, 199-224.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496410389494
  • Cécile Emery, Thomas S. Calvard, and Meghan E. Pierce (2013). Leadership as an emergent group process: A social network study of personality and leadership. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 28-45.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430212461835
  • Susan T. Ennett, Robert W. Faris, Andrea M. Hussong, Nisha Gottfredson and Veronica Cole (2018). Depressive symptomology as a moderator of friend selection and influence on substance use involvement: Estimates from grades 6 to 12 in six longitudinal school-based social networks. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 2337-2352.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0915-5
  • Ceren Erdem (2017). Investigating the dynamic nature of psychological contracts: A study of the coevolution of newcomers' psychological contracts and social networks.
    Doctoral dissertation, The London School of Economics and Political Science.
    http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/3748/1/Erdem__investigating-the-dynamic.pdf

  • Jennifer Flashman (2009). You've got a friend: Adolescent friendship choices, dynamics, and implications for future stratification. PhD dissertation, UCLA, 2009. (Publication No. AAT 3388161)
    http://gradworks.umi.com/33/88/3388161.htm.
  • Jennifer Flashman (2012). Academic Achievement and Its Impact on Friend Dynamics. Sociology of Education, 85, 61-80.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1177/0038040711417014.
  • Janna Fortuin, Mitch van Geel, and Paul Vedder (2016). Peers and academic achievement: A longitudinal study on selection and socialization effects of in-class friends. Journal of Educational Research, 109, 1-6.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.917257.
  • Janna Fortuin, Mitch van Geel, and Paul Vedder (2015). Peer Influences on Internalizing and Externalizing Problems among Adolescents: A Longitudinal Social Network Analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 887-897.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0168-x.
  • Aart Franken, Terrie E. Moffitt, Christian E.G. Steglich, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Zeena Harakeh and Wilma A. M. Vollebergh (2015). The Role of Self-Control and Early Adolescents' Friendships in the Development of Externalizing Behavior: The SNARE Study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 9, 1800-1811.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0287-z.
  • Aart Franken, Loes Keijsers, Jan K. Dijkstra and Tom ter Bogt (2017). Music Preferences, Friendship, and Externalizing Behavior in Early Adolescence: A SIENA Examination of the Music Marker Theory Using the SNARE Study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 1839-1850.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0633-4
  • Katrien Fransen, Ellen Delvaux, Batja Mesquita and Stef Van Puyenbroeck (2018). The Emergence of Shared Leadership in Newly Formed Teams With an Initial Structure of Vertical Leadership: A Longitudinal Analysis. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, in press.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886318756359
  • Thomas N. Friemel (2012). Network dynamics of television use in school classes. Social Networks, 34, 346-358.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.08.002.
  • Gesell, Sabina B. and Tesdahl, Eric and Ruchman, Eileen (2012). The Distribution of Physical Activity in an After-school Friendship Network. Pediatrics, 129, 1064-1071.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/10.1542/peds.2011-2567.
  • Sara Geven, Jeroen Weesie, and Frank van Tubergen (2013). The influence of friends on adolescents' behavior problems at school: The role of ego, alter and dyadic characteristics. Social Networks, 35, 583-592.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.08.002
  • Sara Geven, Jan O. Jonsson, and Frank van Tubergen (2017). Gender differences in resistance to schooling: the role of dynamic peer-influence and selection processes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 2421-2445.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0696-2
  • Matteo Giletta, Ron H. J. Scholte,Mitchell J. Prinstein, Rutger C. M. E. Engels, Emanuela Rabaglietti, and William J. Burk (2012). Friendship Context Matters: Examining the Domain Specificity of Alcohol and Depression Socialization Among Adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 1027-1043. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9625-8.
  • Matteo Giletta, William J. Burk, Ron H. J. Scholte, Rutger C. M. E. Engels and Mitchell J. Prinstein (2013). Direct and Indirect Peer Socialization of Adolescent Nonsuicidal Self-Injury. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 450-463.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12036.
  • James N. Greenwell (2016). Actor-based Models of Substance Use in Adolescent Social Networks: Unravelling complex drivers of behavior. PhD Thesis, The University of Auckland (New Zealand). https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/28326.
  • Danica Vukadinovic Greetham, Robert Hurling, Gabrielle Osborne, and Alex Linley (2011). Social Networks and Positive and Negative Affect. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 22, 4-13.
    DOI:
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.051
  • Mariola C. Gremmen, Christian Berger, Allison M. Ryan, Christian E. G. Steglich, René Veenstra and Jan K. Dijkstra (2018). Adolescents' Friendships, Academic Achievement, and Risk Behaviors: Same-Behavior and Cross-Behavior Selection and Influence Processes. Child Development, 90 (2), e192-e211.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13045
  • Mariola C. Gremmen, Jan K. Dijkstra, Christian Steglich and René Veenstra (2017). First Selection, then Influence: Developmental Differences in Friendship Dynamics Regarding Academic Achievement. Developmental Psychology, 53, 1356-1370.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000314
  • Mariola C. Gremmen, Yvonne H. M. van den Berg, Christian Steglich, René Veenstra and Jan Kornelis Dijkstra (2018). The importance of near-seated peers for elementary students' academic engagement and achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 57, 42-52.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.04.004
  • Steven A. Haas and David R. Schaefer (2014). With a little help from my friends? Asymmetrical social influence on adolescent smoking initiation and cessation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 55, 126-143.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022146514532817.
  • Dana L. Haynie, Nathan J. Doogan, and Brian Soller, (2014). Gender, Friendship Networks, And Delinquency: A Dynamic Network Approach. Criminology, 52, 688-722.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12052.
  • Yuan Hsiao, Ching-Ling Cheng and Ya-Wen Ciu (2019). Gender network dynamics in prosocial and aggressive behavior of early adolescents. Social Networks, 58, 12-23.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.01.002

  • Grace C. Huang, Daniel Soto, Kayo Fujimoto, and Thomas W. Valente (2014). The Interplay of Friendship Networks and Social Networking Sites: Longitudinal Analysis of Selection and Influence Effects on Adolescent Smoking and Alcohol Use. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 8, e51-e59.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302038.
  • Chip Huisman (2014). Does it matter what friends think, say, or do? The role of friends' smoking attitudes and behavior for Dutch adolescents' smoking behavior. Substance Use & Misuse, 49, 715-723.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2013.863347.
  • Chip Huisman and Jeroen Bruggeman (2012). The social network, socioeconomic background, and school type of adolescent smokers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36, 329-337.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025412444078
  • Edmund R. Hunt, Brian Mi, Camila Fernandez, Brandyn M. Wong, Jonathan N. Pruitt and Noa Pinter-Wollman (2018). Social interactions shape individual and collective personality in social spiders. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 285.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1366
  • Rupa Jose, John R. Hipp, Carter T. Butts, Cheng Wang, and Cynthia M. Lakon (2016). Network Structure, Influence, Selection, and Adolescent Delinquent Behavior: Unpacking a Dynamic Process. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 264-284.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093854815605524
  • David Kavaler and Vladimir Filkov (2016). Stochastic actor-oriented modeling for studying homophily and social influence in OSS projects. Empirical Software Engineering, 22, 407-435.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9431-y
  • Margaret Kerr, Maarten Van Zalk, and Håkan Stattin (2012). Psychopathic traits moderate peer influence on adolescent delinquency. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 826-835.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02492.x
  • Jin-Gu Kim and Jin-Iee Park (2018). Exploring Peer Dynamics on Aggression and social status types in a 1st grade elementary school setting: A longitudinal social network analysis. International Journal of Early Childhood Education, 24, special issues, 115-131.
    the link is here too long to be given in text)
  • Noona Kiuru, William J. Burk, Brett Laursen, Katariina Salmela-Aro, and Jari-Erik Nurmi (2010). Pressure to drink but not to smoke: Disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 801-812.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.07.006
  • Noona Kiuru, Dawn DeLay, Brett Laursen, William J. Burk, Marja-Kriistina Lerkkanen, Anna-Maija Poikkeus and Jari-Erik Nurmi (2017). Peer selection and influence on children's reading skills in early primary grades: a social network approach. Reading and Writing, 30, 1473-1500.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9733-5
  • Noona Kiuru, Petri Koivisto, Pertti Mutanen, Jukka Vuori, Jari-Erik Nurmi (2011). How Do Efforts to Enhance Career Preparation Affect Peer Groups? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 679-690.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00701.x
  • Noona Kiuru, William J. Burk, Brett Laursen, Jari-Erik Nurmi, and Katariina Salmela-Aro (2012). Is Depression Contagious? A Test of Alternative Peer Socialization Mechanisms of Depressive Symptoms in Adolescent Peer Networks. Journal of Adolescent Health 50, 250-255.
  • Andrea B. Knecht, William J. Burk, Jeroen Weesie, and Christian E. G. Steglich (2010). Friendship and alcohol use in early adolescence: A multilevel social network approach, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 475-487.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00685.x
  • Andrea Knecht, Tom A. B. Snijders, Chris Baerveldt, Christian E. G. Steglich, and Werner Raub (2010). Friendship and Delinquency: Selection and Influence Processes in Early Adolescence, Social Development, 19, 494-514.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00564.x
  • Olga Kornienko, Thomas J. Dishion and Thao Ha (2017). Peer Network Dynamics and the Amplification of Antisocial to Violent Behavior Among Young Adolescents in Public Middle Schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426617742345
  • Olga Kornienko, Thao Ha and Thomas J. Dishion (2019). Dynamic pathways between rejection and antisocial behavior in peer networks: Update and test of confluence model. Development and Psychopathology, in press.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579418001645
  • David Kretschmer, Lars Leszczensky and Sebastian Pink (2018). Selection and influence processes in academic achievement: More pronounced for girls? Social Networks, 52, 251-260.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.09.003
  • Cynthia M. Lakon, John R. Hipp, Cheng Wang, Carter T. Butts, and Rupa Jose (2015). Simulating Dynamic Network Models and Adolescent Smoking: The Impact of Varying Peer Influence and Peer Selection. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 2438-2448.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302789
  • Cynthia M. Lakon, Cheng Wang, Carter T. Butts, Rupa Jose and John R. Hipp (2017). Cascades of emotional support in friendship networks and adolescent smoking. PloS One, 12, e0180204.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180204
  • Cynthia M. Lakon, Cheng Wang, Carter T. Butts, Rupa Jose, David S. Timberlake, and John R. Hipp (2014). A Dynamic Model of Adolescent Friendship Networks, Parental Influences, and Smoking. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1-20.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0187-7
  • Lydia Laninga-Wijnen, Mariola C. Gremmen, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, René Veenstra, Wilma A. M. Vollebergh and Zeena Harakeh (2018). The role of academic status norms in friendship selection and influence processes related to academic achievement. Developmental Psychology, 55(2), 337-350.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000611

  • Lydia Laninga-Wijnen, Zeena Harakeh, Christian Steglich, Jan K. Dijkstra, René Veenstra, and Wilma Vollebergh (2017). The Norms of Popular Peers Moderate Friendship Dynamics of Adolescent Aggression. Child Development, 88, 1265-1283.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12650
  • Brett Laursen, Danielle Pop, William J. Burk, Margaret Kerr, and Håkan Stattin (2008). Incorporating interdependence into developmental research: Examples from the study of homophily and heterogeneity. In: Noel A. Card, James P. Selig, and Todd D. Little, Modeling Dyadic and Interdependent Data in the Developmental and Behavioral Sciences. New York and London: Routledge, p. 11-37.
  • Sang Yup Lee, Homophily and social influence among online casual game players (2015). Telematics and Informatics, 32, 656-666.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.02.007
  • Lars Leszczensky and Sebastian Pink (2015). Ethnic segregation of friendship networks in school: Testing a rational-choice argument of differences in ethnic homophily between classroom- and grade-level networks. Social Networks, 42, 18-26.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.02.002
  • Lars Leszczensky and Sebastian Pink (2017). Intra- and Inter-group Friendship Choices of Christian, Muslim, and Non-religious Youth in Germany. European Sociological Review, 33, 72-83.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw049
  • Lars Leszczensky, Tobias H. Stark, Andreas Flache, and Anke Munniksma (2015). Disentangling the relation between young immigrants' host country identification and their friendships with natives. Social Networks, 44, 179-189.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.08.001.
  • Kevin Lewis (2011). The co-evolution of social network ties and online privacy behavior. Pp. 91-109 in Privacy Online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-Disclosure in the Social Web, Part 1, edited by S. Trepte and L. Reinecke. Heidelberg and New York: Springer.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_8.
  • Kevin Lewis, Marco Gonzalez, and Jason Kaufman (2012). Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. PNAS 109, 68-72.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109739109.
  • John M. Light, Thomas J. Dishion (2007). Early adolescent antisocial behavior and peer rejection: A dynamic test of a developmental process. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 118, 77-89.
  • John M. Light, Charlotte C. Greenan, Julie C. Rushby, Kimberly M. Nies, and Tom A.B. Snijders (2013). Onset to First Alcohol Use in Early Adolescence: A Network Diffusion Model. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 487-499.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12064.
  • Handrea A. Logis, Philip C. Rodkin, Scott D. Gest and Hai-Jeong Ahn (2013). Popularity as an Organizing Factor of Preadolescent Friendship Networks: Beyond Prosocial and Aggressive Behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 413-423.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12033
  • Gerine M.A. Lodder, Ron H.J. Scholte, Antonius H.N. Cillessen, and Matteo Giletta (2016). Bully Victimization: Selection and Influence Within Adolescent Friendship Networks and Cliques. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 132-144.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0343-8
  • Alessandro Lomi, Tom A.B. Snijders, Christian E.G. Steglich, and Vanina Jasmine Torló (2011). Why Are Some More Peer Than Others? Evidence from a Longitudinal Study of Social Networks and Individual Academic Performance. Social Science Research, 40, 1506-1520.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.010.
  • Emily Long (2018). Using social network analysis to examine the intersection of adolescent friendships and health behavior. Doctoral Dissertation, Utah State University. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations 7084.
    https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7084
  • Emily Long and Thomas W. Valente (2018). Perceived social acceptability and longitudinal trends in adolescent cigarette smoking. Prevention Science, in press.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0945-y
  • Emily Long, Tyson S. Barrett and Ginger Lockhart (2017). Network-Behavior Dynamics of Adolescent Friendships, Alcohol Use, and Physical Activity. Health Psychology, 36, 577-586.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000483
  • Miranda J. Lubbers, Tom A.B. Snijders, and Margaretha P.C. van der Werf (2011). Dynamics of Peer Relationships Across the First Two Years of Junior High as a Function of Gender and Changes in Classroom Composition. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 488-504.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00688.x .
  • Mark S. Manger and Mark A. Pickup (2016). The Coevolution of Trade Agreement Networks and Democracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 60, 164-191.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002714535431 .
  • Carol L. Martin, Olga Kornienko, David R. Schaefer, Laura D. Hanish, Richard A. Fabes and Priscilla Goble (2013). The Role of Sex of Peers and Gender-Typed Activities in Young Children's Peer Affiliative Networks: A Longitudinal Analysis of Selectionand Influence. Child Development, 84, 921-937.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12032
  • Cécile Mathys, William J. Burk and Antonius H. N. Cillessen (2013). Popularity as a Moderator of Peer Selection and Socialization of Adolescent Alcohol, Marijuana, and Tobacco Use. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 513-523.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12031.
  • Petr Matous and Yasuyuki Todo (2015). Exploring dynamic mechanisms of learning networks for resource conservation. Ecology and Society 20(2): 36.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07602-200236.
  • Petr Matous and Yasuyuki Todo (2017). Analyzing the coevolution of interorganizational networks and organizational performance: Automakers' production networks in Japan. Applied Network Science, 2, 5.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-017-0024-5
  • Petr Matous, Yasuyuki Todo And Tatsuya Ishikawa (2014). Emergence of multiplex mobile phone communication networks across rural areas: An Ethiopian experiment. Network Science, 2, 162-188.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/nws.2014.12
  • Cassie McMillan, Diane Felmlee and D. Wayne Osgood (2018). Peer influence, friend selection, and gender: How network processes shape adolescent smoking, drinking, and delinquency. Social Networks, 55, 86-96.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.05.008
  • Jingbo Meng (2016). Your Health Buddies Matter: Preferential Selection and Social Influence on Weight Management in an Online Health Social Network. Health Communication, 31, 1460-1471.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1079760
  • Sterett H. Mercer and Melissa A. Derosier (2010). Selection and Socialization of Internalizing Problems in Middle Childhood. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 1031-1056.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.9.1031.
  • L. Mercken, J.E. Saul, R.H. Lemaire, T.W. Valente, and S.J. Leischow (2015). Coevolution of Information Sharing and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices Among North American Tobacco Cessation Quitlines. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 1814-1822.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302627.
  • L. Mercken, E.F.C. Sleddens, H. de Vries, and C.E.G. Steglich (2013). Choosing adolescent smokers as friends: The role of parenting and parental smoking. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 383-392.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.004.
  • L. Mercken, T.A.B. Snijders, C. Steglich, E. Vartiainen, H. de Vries (2010). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Social Networks, 32, 72-81.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.005.
  • L. Mercken, T.A.B. Snijders, C. Steglich, E. Vartiainen, H. de Vries (2010). Smoking-based selection and influence in gender-segregated friendship networks: a social network analysis of adolescent smoking . Addiction, 105, 1280-1289.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02930.x.
  • Liesbeth Mercken, Tom A.B. Snijders, Christian Steglich, Hein de Vries (2009). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior: Social network analyses in six European countries. Social Science and Medicine (2009), 69, 1506-1514.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.003.
  • Liesbeth Mercken, Christian Steglich, Ronald Knibbe, Hein de Vries (2012). Dynamics of Friendship Networks and Alcohol Use in Early and Mid-Adolescence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 99-110.
  • Liesbeth Mercken, Christian Steglich, Philip Sinclair, Jo Holliday, and Laurence Moore (2012). A longitudinal social network analysis of peer influence, peer selection, and smoking behavior among adolescents in British schools. Health Psychology, 31, 450-459.
    DOI: http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0026876.
  • Loes Meeussen, Filip Agneessens, Ellen Delvaux and Karen Phalet (2018). Ethnic diversity and value sharing: A longitudinal social network perspective on interactive group processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 428-447.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12237
  • Gabriel J. Merrin, Kayla de la Haye, Dorothy L. Espelage, Brett Ewing, Joan S. Tucker, Matthew Hoover and Harold D. Green Jr. (2018). The Co-evolution of Bullying Perpetration, Homophobic Teasing, and a School Friendship Network. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 601-618.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0783-4
  • Steffen Mohrenberg (2017). Studying Policy Diffusion with Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models. In: Betina Hollstein, Wenzel Matiaske, and Kai-Uwe Schnapp, Networked Governance: New Research Perspectives, p. 163-188, Cham: Springer.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50386-8_10.
  • Andres Molano, Stephanie M. Jones, Joshua L. Brown and J. Lawrence Aber (2013). Selection and Socialization of Aggressive and Prosocial Behavior: The Moderating Role of Social-Cognitive Processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 424-436.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12034.
  • Marlon P. Mundt (2013). Social Network Analysis of Peer Effects on Binge Drinking among U.S. Adolescents. In Ariel M. Greenberg, William G. Kennedy, and Nathan D. Bos, Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7812. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37210-0_14.
  • Marlon P. Mundt, Liesbeth Mercken, and Larissa Zakletskaia (2012). Peer selection and influence effects on adolescent alcohol use: a stochastic actor-based model. BMC Pediatrics 2012, 12:115. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/12/115.
  • Ojanen, T., Sijtsema, J. J., Hawley, P. H., and Little, T. D. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in early adolescents' friendship development: Friendship selection, influence, and prospective friendship quality. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 837-851.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.08.004.
  • Tiina Ojanen, Jelle J. Sijtsema and Ashwin J. Rambaran (2013). Social Goals and Adolescent Friendships: Social Selection, Deselection, and Influence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 550-662.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12043.
  • D. Wayne Osgood, Mark E. Feinberg, and Daniel T. Ragan (2015). Social Networks and the Diffusion of Adolescent Problem Behavior: Reliable Estimates of Selection and Influence from Sixth Through Ninth Grades. Prevention Science, 16, 832-843.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0558-7.
  • D. Wayne Osgood, Daniel T. Ragan, Lacey Wallace, Scott D. Gest, Mark E. Feinberg and James Moody (2013). Peers and the Emergence of Alcohol Use: Influence and Selection Processes in Adolescent Friendship Networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 500-512.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12059.
  • Mark C. Pachucki, Emily J. Ozer, Alain Barrat, Ciro Cattuto (2015). Mental health and social networks in early adolescence: A dynamic study of objectively-measured social interaction behaviors. Social Science & Medicine 125, 40-50.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.015.
  • Diego Palacios and Christian Berger (2015). Are good students desirable friends? Evidence for friendship selection among elementary students / ¿Son los buenos estudiantes amigos deseables? Evidencia para la selección de amistad entre estudiantes de educación primaria. Estudios de Psicología: Studies in Psychology, 36, 496-508.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2015.1028729
  • Pearson, Michael, Steglich, Christian, and Snijders, Tom (2006). Homophily and assimilation among sport-active adolescent substance users. Connections 27(1), 47-63.
    (Note: the quadratic shape function has mistakenly been omitted from the specification of the behavior objective function in the analyses reported here.)
  • Christina Prell and Kuishuang Feng (2016). The evolution of global trade and impacts on countries' carbon trade imbalances. Social Networks 46, 87-100.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.03.001
  • Emanuela Rabaglietti, William J. Burk, and Matteo Giletta (2012). Regulatory self-efficacy as a moderator of peer socialization relating to Italian adolescents' alcohol intoxication. Social Development, 21, 522-536.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00637.x
  • Isabel J. Raabe, Zsófia Boda and Christoph Stadtfeld (2019). The social pipeline: How friend influence and peer exposure widen the STEM gender gap. Sociology of Education, in press.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040718824095
    Multilevel (uses sienaBayes).

  • Daniel T. Ragan, D. Wayne Osgood and Mark E. Feinberg (2014). Friends as a bridge to parental influence: Implications for adolescent alcohol use. Social Forces, 92, 1061-1085.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot117
  • Daniel T. Ragan (2014). Revisiting "what they think": adolescent drinking and the importance of peer beliefs. Criminology, 52, 488-513.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12044
  • Daniel T. Ragan(2016). Peer beliefs and smoking in adolescence: a longitudinal social network analysis. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 42, 222-230.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2015.1119157
  • Ashwin J. Rambaran, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra and Tobias H. Stark (2013). Status-Based Influence Processes: The Role of Norm Salience in Contagion of Adolescent Risk Attitudes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 574-585.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12032
  • J. Ashwin Rambaran, Andrea Hopmeyer, David Schwartz, Christian E.G. Steglich, Daryaneh Badaly, and René Veenstra (2016). Academic functioning and peer influences: A short-term longitudinal study of network-behavior dynamics in middle adolescence. Child Development, 88, 523-543.
  • Rayner, Kathryn E., Carolyn A. Schniering, Ronald M. Rapee, Alan Taylor, and Delyse M. Hutchinson (2013). Adolescent girls' friendship networks, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating: Examining selection and socialization processes. Journal Of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 93-104.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1037/a0029304.
  • Lauren Rhue and Arun Sundararajan (2014). Digital access, political networks and the diffusion of democracy. Social Networks, 36, 40-53. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.06.007.
  • Deborah Rivas-Drake, Muniba Saleem, David R. Schaefer, Michael Medina and Robert Jagers (2018). Intergroup contact attitudes across peer networks in school: Selection, influence, and implications for cross-group friendships. Child Development, in press.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13061
  • Deborah Rivas-Drake, Adriana J Umaña-Taylor, David R Schaefer, and Michael Medina (2017). Ethnic-Racial Identity and Friendships in Early Adolescence. Child Development, 88, 710-724.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12790
  • Kelly L. Rulison, Scott D. Gest and Eric Loken (2013). Dynamic Social Networks and Physical Aggression: The Moderating Role of Gender and Social Status Among Peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 437-449.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12044.
  • David R. Schaefer (2018). A Network Analysis of Factors Leading Adolescents to Befriend Substance-Using Peers. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34, 275-312.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9335-4.

  • David R. Schaefer, jimi adams, and Steven A. Haas (2013). Social Networks and Smoking: Exploring the Effects of Peer Influence and Smoker Popularity Through Simulations. Health Education and Behavior, 40, no. 1, 24S-32S.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1090198113493091.
  • Mathis Schulte, N. Andrew Cohen, and Katherine J. Klein. The Coevolution of Network Ties and Perceptions of Team Psychological Safety. Organization Science 23 (2012), 564-581.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0582.
  • Miranda Sentse, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Christina Salmivalli, and Antonius H. N. Cillessen (2013). The Dynamics of Friendships and Victimization in Adolescence: A Longitudinal Social Network Perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 229-238.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.21469.
  • Miranda Sentse, Noona Kiuru, René Veenstra, and Christina Salmivalli (2014). A Social Network Approach to the Interplay Between Adolescents' Bullying and Likeability over Time. Journal of youth and adolescence Journal of youth and adolescence, 43, 1409-1420.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0129-4.
  • Huiyoung Shin (2017). Friendship Dynamics of Adolescent Aggression, Prosocial Behavior, and Social Status: The Moderating Role of Gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 2305-2320.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0702-8
  • Huiyoung Shin and Allison M. Ryan (2014). Friendship Networks and Achievement Goals: An Examination of Selection and Influence Processes and Variations by Gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1453-1464.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0132-9.
  • Huiyoung Shin and Allison M. Ryan (2017). Friend influence on early adolescent disruptive behavior in the classroom: Teacher emotional support matters. Developmental Psychology, 53, 114-125.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000250.
  • Michael D. Siciliano, Nienke M. Moolenaar, Alan J. Daly and YiHwa Liou (2017). A Cognitive Perspective on Policy Implementation: Reform Beliefs, Sensemaking, and Social Networks. Public Administration Review, 77, 889-901.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12797
  • Jelle J. Sijtsema and Siegwart M. Lindenberg (2018). Peer influence in the development of adolescent antisocial behavior: Advances from dynamic social network studies. Developmental Review, 50 B, 140-154.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.08.002
  • Shoham, D.A., Tong, L., Lamberson, P.J., Auchincloss, A.H., Zhang, J., et al. (2012). An Actor-Based Model of Social Network Influence on Adolescent Body Size, Screen Time, and Playing Sports. PLoS ONE 7(6): e39795.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039795.
  • Jelle J. Sijtsema, Tiina Ojanen, René Veenstra, Siegwart Lindenberg, Patricia H. Hawley, and Todd D. Little (2010). Forms and functions of aggression in adolescent friendship selection and influence: A longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development 19, 515-534.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00566.x.
  • Jelle J. Sijtsema, Ashwin J. Rambaran, and Tiina J. Ojanen (2013). Overt and relational victimization and adolescent friendships: Selection, de-selection, and social influence. Social Influence, 8, 177-195.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.739097.
  • Sijtsema, J.J., Rambaran, J.A., Caravita, S.C.S., and Gini, G. (2014). Friendship Selection and Influence in Bullying and Defending: Effects of Moral Disengagement. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2093-2104.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037145.
  • Melissa Simone, Emily Long and Ginger Lockhart (2018). The Dynamic Relationship between Unhealthy Weight Control and Adolescent Friendships: A Social Network Approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1373-1384.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0796-z
  • Sandra D. Simpkins, David R. Schaefer, Chara D. Price and Andrea E. Vest (2013). Adolescent Friendships, BMI, and Physical Activity: Untangling Selection and Influence Through Longitudinal Social Network Analysis. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 537-549.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2012.00836.x.
  • Christian Steglich, Philip Sinclair, Jo Holliday, Laurence Moore (2012). Actor-based analysis of peer influence in A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial (ASSIST). Social Networks, 34, 359-369.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.07.001.
  • Steglich, C.E.G., Snijders, T.A.B. and West, P. (2006), Applying SIENA: An illustrative analysis of the co-evolution of adolescents' friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption. Methodology, 2, 48-56.
    (Note: the quadratic shape function has mistakenly been omitted from the specification of the behavior objective function in the analyses reported here.)
    For a re-analysis, see one of the Practicals at the RSiena scripts page.
  • Karen Stepanyan, Richard Mather, and Roger Dalrymple (2014). Culture, role and group work: A social network analysis perspective on an online collaborative course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 676-693.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12076.
  • Ylva Svensson, William J. Burk, Håkan Stattin, and Margaret Kerr (2012). Peer selection and influence of delinquent behavior of immigrant and nonimmigrant youths: Does context matter? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36, 178-185.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025411434652.
  • Lauree C. Tilton-Weaver, William J. Burk, Margaret Kerr, and Håkan Stattin (2013). Can Parental Monitoring and Peer Management Reduce the Selection or Influence of Delinquent Peers? Testing the Question Using a Dynamic Social Network Approach. Developmental Psychology, 49, 2057-2070.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031854
  • Sarah L. Trinh, Jaemin Lee, Carolyn T. Halpern, and James Moody (2019). Our Buddies, Ourselves: The Role of Sexual Homophily in Adolescent Friendship Networks. Child Development, 90, e132-e147.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13052
  • Troester, C., Parker, A., van Knippenberg, D., and Sahlmueller, B. (2018). The Coevolution of Social Networks and Thoughts of Quitting. Academy of Management Journal, 62, 22-43 .
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0914 https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0914
  • Joan S. Tucker, Kayla de la Haye, David P. Kennedy, Harold D. Green Jr., and Michael S. Pollard (2014). Peer Influence on Marijuana Use in Different Types of Friendships. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54, 67-73.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.025.
  • Ilmo van der Löwe and Brian Parkinson (2014). Relational emotions and social networks. In Christian von Scheve, Mikko Salmela (eds.), Collective Emotions: Perspectives from Psychology, Philosophy, and Sociology, pp. 125-140. Oxford University Press.
  • Loes Van Rijsewijk, Jan Kornelis, Dijkstra, Kim Pattiselanno, Christian E.G. Steglich, and René Veenstra, R. (2016). Who helps whom? Investigating the development of adolescent prosocial relationships. Developmental Psychology, 52, 894-908.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000106
  • Mark J. Van Ryzin, Dawn DeLay, and Thomas J. Dishion (2016). Being well-liked predicts increased use of alcohol but not tobacco in early adolescence. Addictive Behaviors, 53, 168-174.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.10.017
  • Maarten van Zalk and Jaap Denissen (2015). Idiosyncratic versus social consensus approaches to personality: Self-view, perceived, and peer-view similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 121-141.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000035.
  • Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr, Susan T. Branje, Håkan Stattin, and Wim H.J. Meeus (2010). It Takes Three: Selection, Influence, and De-Selection Processes of Depression in Adolescent Friendship Networks. Developmental Psychology, 46, 927-938.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019661.
  • Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr, Susan T. Branje, Håkan Stattin, and Wim H.J. Meeus (2010). Peer Contagion and Adolescent Depression: The Role of Failure Anticipation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39, 837-848.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2010.517164.
  • Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr, Nejra Van Zalk, and Håkan Stattin (2012). Xenophobia and Tolerance Toward Immigrants in Adolescence: Cross-Influence Processes Within Friendships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 79, 499-526.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9694-8.
  • Maarten H.W. van Zalk, Steffen Nestler, Katharina Geukes, Roos Hutteman, and Mitja D. Back (2019). The Co-Development of Extraversion and Friendships: Bonding and Behavioral Mechanisms in Friendship Networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, in press. Idiosyncratic versus social consensus approaches to personality: Self-view, perceived, and peer-view similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 121-141.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000035.
  • Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk and Nejra Van Zalk (2015). The Importance of Perceived Care and Connectedness with Friends and Parents for Adolescent Social Anxiety. Journal of Personality, 83, 346-360.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12108.
  • Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk and Nejra Van Zalk (2015). Violent peer influence: The roles of self-esteem and psychopathic traits. Development and Psychopathology, 27, 1077-1088.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579415000693.
  • Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk, Nejra Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr, and Håkan Stattin (2014). Influences Between Online-Exclusive, Conjoint and Offline-Exclusive Friendship Networks: The Moderating Role of Shyness. European Journal of Personality, 28, pages 134-146.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.1895.
  • Nejra Van Zalk, Maarten Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr and Håkan Stattin (2011). Social Anxiety as a Basis for Friendship Selection and Socialization in Adolescents' Social Networks. Journal of Personality, 79, 499-526.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00682.x.
  • René Veenstra, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Christian Steglich and Maarten H. W. Van Zalk (2013). Network-Behavior Dynamics. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 399-412.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12070.
  • Frank Weerman (2011). Delinquent Peers in Context: A Longitudinal Network Analysis of Selection and Influence Effects. Criminology, 49, 253-286.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00223.x.
  • Nicole van Workum, Ron H. J. Scholte, Antonius H. N. Cillessen, Gerine M. A. Lodder and Matteo Giletta (2013). Selection, Deselection, and Socialization Processes of Happiness in Adolescent Friendship Networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 563-573.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12035.
  • Cheng Wang, John R. Hipp, Carter T. Butts, Rupa Jose, Cynthia M. Lakon (2015). Alcohol Use among Adolescent Youth: The Role of Friendship Networks and Family Factors in Multiple School Studies. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0119965.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119965
  • Cheng Wang, John R. Hipp, Carter T. Butts and Cynthia M. Lakon (2018). The interdependence of cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use in the context of schoolbased social networks. PloS ONE, 13(7): e0200904.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200904
  • Ming-Te Wang, Noona Kiuru, Jessica L. Degol and Katariina Salmela-Aro (2018). Friends, academic achievement, and school engagement during adolescence: A social network approach to peer influence and selection effects. Learning and Instruction, 58, 148-160.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.06.003
  • Zebing Wu (2015). Adolescent friendship network and college enrollment: a longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence processes. PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) thesis, University of Iowa, 2015.
  • Hsieh-Hua Yang and Chyi-In Wu (2015). Evolution Model of Adolescent Friendship Networks and BMI. In Proceedings of the ASE BigData & SocialInformatics 2015 (ASE BD&SI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 18.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2818869.2818917
  • Jun Zhang, David A. Shoham, Eric Tesdahl, and Sabina B. Gesell (2015). Network Interventions on Physical Activity in an Afterschool Program: An Agent-Based Social Network Study. American Journal of Public Health 105, No. S2, S236-S243.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302277
  • Gennady Zavyalov (2018). Analyzing the Dynamic Interdependence of Network Structure and Performance in Board Interlocks. Chapter 4: Performance Implications of Board Interlocks.
    PhD Thesis UiS no. 414, University of Stavanger.
  • Franziska Zuber (2015). Spread of Unethical Behavior in Organizations: A Dynamic Social Network Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 131, 151-172.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2270-0



Articles about two-mode networks (most of these are about co-evolution of a one-mode and a two-mode network, hence multivariate)



Articles about multivariate and valued networks



Articles about exponential random graph models



In Chinese: Dynamics of networks and behavior.



In Dutch: Dynamics of networks and behavior.



In French: Dynamics of networks

In French: exponential random graph models



In Hungarian: Dynamics of multivariate networks.
  • Dorottya Kisfalusi and Károly Takács (2018). A pletyka és a reputáció összefüggései középiskolai osztályközösségekben. Szociológiai Szemle, 28(1), 83-104.
    http://real.mtak.hu/80872/1/83_104.pdf



In Russian: Dynamics of networks and behavior.



In Spanish: Dynamics of networks

In Spanish: Dynamics of networks and behavior

  • Diego Palacios and Christian Berger (2015). Are good students desirable friends? Evidence for friendship selection among elementary students / ¿Son los buenos estudiantes amigos deseables? Evidencia para la selección de amistad entre estudiantes de educación primaria. Estudios de Psicología: Studies in Psychology, 36, 496-508.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2015.1028729.




Back to the main Siena page