Applications of Siena

Next to the illustrations in the methodological articles, applications of Siena can be found in the following articles.

Articles about dynamics of networks.

Filip Agneessens and Rafael Wittek, (2011), Where do intra-organizational advice relations come from? The role of informal status and social capital in social exchange. Social Networks, 33, in press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.04.002.
Andrew, Simon, Institutional Ties, Interlocal Contractual Arrangements, and the Dynamic of Metropolitan Governance. PhD thesis, Florida State University (2006).
Andrew, Simon, Regional integration through contracting networks. An empirical analysis of institutional collection action framework. Urban Affairs Review 44 (2009), 378-402.
Chris Baerveldt, Gerhard G. van de Bunt, Ainhoa de Federico (2010), Why and how selection patterns in classroom networks differ between students. The potential influence of networks size preferences, level of information, and group membership. REDES Vol. 19, p. 272-300.
This is not an empirical application, but a theoretical study relevant to model selection.
Also available in Spanish; see below.
Checkley, Matthew, and Steglich, Christian E.G. (2007). Partners in power: Job mobility and dynamic deal-making. European Management Review Vol.4 (2007), 161-171.
Chu-Shore, Jesse (2010). Homogenization and specialization effects of international trade: are cultural goods exceptional? World Development 38, 37-47.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.001.
de Nooy, Wouter, The dynamics of artistic prestige. Poetics, 30 (2002), 147-167.
Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Christian Berger, and Siegwart Lindenberg (2011). Do Physical and Relational Aggression Explain Adolescents' Friendship Selection? The Competing Roles of Network Characteristics, Gender, and Social Status. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 1-13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.20402.
J.J. Ebbers and N.M. Wijnberg (2010). Disentangling the effects of reputation and network position on the evolution of alliance networks. Strategic Organization, 8 (3), 255-275.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476127010381102
J.C. Johnson, J.J. Luczkovich. S.P. Borgatti, and T.A.B. Snijders. Using social network analysis tools in ecology: Markov process transition models applied to the seasonal trophic network dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay. Ecological Modeling 220 (2009) 3133-3140.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.037.
Ko, P.-C., and Buskens, V (2011). Dynamics of adolescent friendships: The interplay between structure and gender. Proceedings - 2011 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2011, pp. 313-320.
DOI: : http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2011.30.
Luka Kronegger, Franc Mali, Anuška Ferligoj and Patrick Doreian (2011). Collaboration structures in Slovenian scientific communities. Scientometrics, in press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0493-8.
Lazega, E., Lemercier, C., and Mounier, L. (2006). A Spinning top model of formal organization and informal behavior: dynamics of advice networks among judges in a commercial court. European Management Review, 3, 113-122.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500058.
Lazega, E., Mounier, L., Snijders, T.A.B., and Tubaro, P. (2010). Norms, status and the dynamics of advice networks: A case study. Social Networks, 33, in press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.12.001.
Emmanuel Lazega, Saraï Sapulete, and Lise Mounier (2011). Structural stability regardless of membership turnover? The added value of blockmodelling in the analysis of network evolution. Quality and Quantity, 45, 129-144.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9295-y.
A. Mehra, J. Marineau, A.B. Lopes, and T.K. Dass (2009). The coevolution of friendship and leadership networks in small groups. In G.B. Graen and J.A. Graen (eds), Predator's Game-Changing Designs: Research-Based Tools. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 145-162.
Paulina Preciado, Tom A.B. Snijders, William J. Burk, Håkan Stattin, and Margaret Kerr (2012). Does proximity matter? Distance dependence of adolescent friendships. Social Networks, 34, 18-31.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.01.002.
Schaefer, David R., Olga Kornienko and Andrew M. Fox (2011). Misery Does not Love Company: Network Selection Mechanisms and Depression Homophily. American Sociological Review 76, 764-785.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003122411420813.
David R. Schaefer, John M. Light, Richard A. Fabes, Laura D. Hanish, Carol Lynn Martin (2010). Fundamental principles of network formation among preschool children. Social Networks, 32, 61-71.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.04.003.
Mathias Smångs (2010). Delinquency, Social Skills and the Structure of Peer Relations: Assessing Criminological Theories by Social Network Theory. Social Forces 89, 609-632. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0069.
T.W. Valente, K. Fujimoto, P. Palmer, and S.P. Tanjasiri (2010). A network assessment of community-based participatory research: Linking communities and universities to reduce cancer disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1319-1325.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.171116
van de Bunt, G.G., Friends by Choice. An Actor-Oriented Statistical Network Model for Friendship Networks Through Time.
Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, 1999.
van de Bunt, G.G. and Groenewegen, P., An actor-oriented dynamic network approach: The case of interorganizational network evolution.
Organizational Research Methods 10 (2007), 463-482.
van de Bunt, G.G., Van Duijn, M.A.J., and Snijders, T.A.B., Friendship networks through time: An actor-oriented statistical network model.
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 5 (1999), 167-192.
van de Bunt, G.G., Wittek, R.P.M., and de Klepper M.C., The Evolution of intra-organizational trust networks; The case of a German paper factory: an empirical test of six trust mechanisms.
International Sociology 20 (2005), 339-369.
van Duijn, Marijtje A.J., Zeggelink, Evelien P.H., Huisman, Mark, Stokman, Frans N., and Wasseur, Frans W. Evolution of sociology freshmen into a friendship network.
Journal of Mathematical Sociology 27 (2003), 153-191.
Maarten Van Zalk / Selfhout, William Burk, Susan Branje, Jaap Denissen, Marcel van Aken, and Wim Meeus (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and big five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78, 509-538.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00625.x.
T. Camber Warren (2010). The geometry of security: Modeling interstate alliances as evolving networks. Journal of Peace Research, 47, 697-709.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022343310386270.
Whitbread, R., Fonti, F., Steglich, Ch. and Contractor, N. (2011). From micro-actions to macro-structure: A structurational approach to the evolution of organizational networks. Human Communication Research, 37, 404-433.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01404.x.

Articles about dynamics of personal networks.

Miranda J. Lubbers, Jose Luis Molina, Jurgen Lerner, Ulrik Brandes, Javier Avila, Christopher McCarty (2010). Longitudinal analysis of personal networks. The case of Argentinean migrants in Spain. Social Networks, 32, 91-104.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.05.001.

Articles about dynamics of networks and behavior.

Tutorial / review articles

Veenstra, R., and Dijkstra, J.K. (2011). Transformations in Peer Networks. Chapter 7 (pp. 135-154) in B. Laursen and W.A. Collins (eds.), Relationship Pathways: From Adolescence to Young Adulthood. New York: Sage.
Veenstra, R., and Steglich, C. (2012). Actor-based model for network and behavior dynamics: A tool to examine selection and influence processes. Chapter 34 (pp. 598-618) in B. Laursen, T. D. Little, and N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods. New York: Guilford Press.

Research articles

Filip Agneessens and Rafael Wittek, (2008), Social capital and employee well-being: disentangling intrapersonal and interpersonal selection and influence mechanisms. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49, 613-637.
Chris Baerveldt, Beate Völker, and Ronan Van Rossem (2008). Revisiting selection and influence: an inquiry into the friendship networks of high school students and their association with delinquency. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 50, 559-587.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.50.5.559.
(Note: the quadratic shape function may have been mistakenly omitted from the specification of the behavior objective function in the analyses reported here.)
Ramiro Berardo and John T. Scholz, (2010), Self-Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection and Cooperation in Estuaries. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 632-649.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.x.
William J. Burk, Margaret Kerr, and Håkan Stattin (2008), The co-evolution of early adolescent friendship networks, school involvement, and delinquent behaviors. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49, 499-522.
Burk, William J., Steglich, Christian E.G., and Snijders, Tom A.B. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 397-404.
Burk, W.J., Van der Vorst, H., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2012). Alcohol intoxication frequency and friendship dynamics: Selection and socialization in early, mid- and late adolescent peer networks. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 89-98.
Maurits de Klepper, Ed Sleebos, Gerhard van de Bunt, and Filip Agneessens (2010). Similarity in friendship networks: Selection or influence? The effect of constraining contexts and non-visible individual attributes. Social Networks, 32, 82-90.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.06.003.
Kayla de la Haye, Garry Robins, Philip Mohr, and Carlene Wilson (2011). Homophily and Contagion as Explanations for Weight Similarities Among Adolescent Friends. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49, 421-427.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.02.008.
Kayla de la Haye, Garry Robins, Philip Mohr, and Carlene Wilson. How physical activity shapes, and is shaped by, adolescent friendships (2011). Social Science and Medicine, 73, 719-728.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.023.
Dijkstra, J.K., Gest, S.D., Lindenberg, S., Veenstra, R., and Cillessen, A.H.N. (2011). The emergence of weapon carrying in peer context. Testing three explanations: the role of aggression, victimization, and friends. Journal of Adolescent Health, in press.
Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., Veenstra, R., Steglich, C., Isaacs, J., Card, N. A. and Hodges, E. V. E. (2010). Influence and selection processes in weapon carrying during adolescence: The roles of status, aggression, and vulnerability. Criminology, 48, 187-220.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00183.x.
Cécile Emery, Kim Daniloski, and Anne Hamby (2011). The reciprocal effects of self-view as a leader and leadership emergence. Small Group Research, 42, 199-224.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496410389494.
Jennifer Flashman (2009). You've got a friend: Adolescent friendship choices, dynamics, and implications for future stratification. PhD dissertation, UCLA, 2009. (Publication No. AAT 3388161)
http://gradworks.umi.com/33/88/3388161.htm.
Jennifer Flashman (2011). Academic Achievement and Its Impact on Friend Dynamics. Sociology of Education, in press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1177/0038040711417014.
Thomas N. Friemel (2011). Network dynamics of television use in school classes. Social Networks, in press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.08.002.
Danica Vukadinovic Greetham, Robert Hurling, Gabrielle Osborne, and Alex Linley (2011). Social Networks and Positive and Negative Affect. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 22, 4-13.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.051.
Margaret Kerr, Maarten Van Zalk, and Håkan Stattin (2011). Psychopathic traits moderate peer influence on adolescent delinquency. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, in press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02492.x.
Noona Kiuru, William J. Burk, Brett Laursen, Katariina Salmela-Aro, and Jari-Erik Nurmi (2010). Pressure to drink but not to smoke: Disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 801-812.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.07.006
Andrea B. Knecht, William J. Burk, Jeroen Weesie, and Christian E. G. Steglich (2010). Friendship and alcohol use in early adolescence: A multilevel social network approach, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 475-487.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00685.x
Andrea Knecht, Tom A. B. Snijders, Chris Baerveldt, Christian E. G. Steglich, and Werner Raub (2010). Friendship and Delinquency: Selection and Influence Processes in Early Adolescence, Social Development, 19, 494-514.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00564.x.
Brett Laursen, Danielle Pop, William J. Burk, Margaret Kerr, and Håkan Stattin (2008). Incorporating interdependence into developmental research: Examples from the study of homophily and heterogeneity. In: Noel A. Card, James P. Selig, and Todd D. Little, Modeling Dyadic and Interdependent Data in the Developmental and Behavioral Sciences. New York and London: Routledge, p. 11-37.
Kevin Lewis (2011). The co-evolution of social network ties and online privacy behavior. Pp. 91-109 in Privacy Online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-Disclosure in the Social Web, Part 1, edited by S. Trepte and L. Reinecke. Heidelberg and New York: Springer.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_8.
Kevin Lewis, Marco Gonzalez, and Jason Kaufman (2011). Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. PNAS 2011; published ahead of print December 19, 2011.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109739109.
John M. Light, Thomas J. Dishion (2007). Early adolescent antisocial behavior and peer rejection: A dynamic test of a developmental process. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 118, 77-89.
Alessandro Lomi, Tom A.B. Snijders, Christian E.G. Steglich, and Vanina Jasmine Torló (2011). Why Are Some More Peer Than Others? Evidence from a Longitudinal Study of Social Networks and Individual Academic Performance. Social Science Research, 40, 1506-1520.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.010.
Miranda J. Lubbers, Tom A.B. Snijders, and Margaretha P.C. van der Werf (2011). Dynamics of Peer Relationships Across the First Two Years of Junior High as a Function of Gender and Changes in Classroom Composition. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 488-504.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00688.x .
Sterett H. Mercer and Melissa A. Derosier (2010). Selection and Socialization of Internalizing Problems in Middle Childhood. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 1031-1056.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.9.1031.
L. Mercken, T.A.B. Snijders, C. Steglich, E. Vartiainen, H. de Vries (2010). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Social Networks, 32, 72-81.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.005.
L. Mercken, T.A.B. Snijders, C. Steglich, E. Vartiainen, H. de Vries (2010). Smoking-based selection and influence in gender-segregated friendship networks: a social network analysis of adolescent smoking . Addiction, 105, 1280-1289.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02930.x.
Liesbeth Mercken, Tom A.B. Snijders, Christian Steglich, Hein de Vries (2009). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior: Social network analyses in six European countries. Social Science and Medicine (2009), 69, 1506-1514.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.003.
Liesbeth Mercken, Christian Steglich, Ronald Knibbe, Hein de Vries (2012). Dynamics of Friendship Networks and Alcohol Use in Early and Mid-Adolescence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 99-110.
Ojanen, T., Sijtsema, J. J., Hawley, P. H., and Little, T. D. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in early adolescents' friendship development: Friendship selection, influence, and prospective friendship quality. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 837-851.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.08.004.
Pearson, Michael, Steglich, Christian, and Snijders, Tom (2006). Homophily and assimilation among sport-active adolescent substance users. Connections 27(1), 47-63.
(Note: the quadratic shape function has mistakenly been omitted from the specification of the behavior objective function in the analyses reported here.)
Jelle J. Sijtsema, Tiina Ojanen, Rene Veenstra, Siegwart Lindenberg, Patricia H. Hawley, and Todd D. Little (2010). Forms and functions of aggression in adolescent friendship selection and influence: A longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development 19, 515-534.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00566.x.
Christian Steglich, Philip Sinclair, Jo Holliday, Laurence Moore (2010). Actor-based analysis of peer influence in A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial (ASSIST). Social Networks, in press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.07.001.
Steglich, C.E.G., Snijders, T.A.B. and West, P. (2006), Applying SIENA: An illustrative analysis of the co-evolution of adolescents' friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption. Methodology, 2, 48-56.
(Note: the quadratic shape function has mistakenly been omitted from the specification of the behavior objective function in the analyses reported here.)
Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr, Susan T. Branje, Håkan Stattin, and Wim H.J. Meeus (2010). It Takes Three: Selection, Influence, and De-Selection Processes of Depression in Adolescent Friendship Networks. Developmental Psychology, 46, 927-938.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019661.
Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr, Susan T. Branje, Håkan Stattin, and Wim H.J. Meeus (2010). Peer Contagion and Adolescent Depression: The Role of Failure Anticipation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39, 837-848.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2010.517164.
Nejra Van Zalk, Maarten Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr and Håkan Stattin (2011). Social Anxiety as a Basis for Friendship Selection and Socialization in Adolescents' Social Networks. Journal of Personality, 79, 499-526.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00682.x.
Frank Weerman (2011). Delinquent Peers in Context: A Longitudinal Network Analysis of Selection and Influence Effects. Criminology, 49, 253-286.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00223.x.

Articles about exponential random graph models

Richard C. Feiock, In Won Lee, Hyung Jun Park and Keon-Hyung Lee (2010). Collaboration Networks Among Local Elected Officials: Information, Commitment, and Risk Aversion. Urban Affairs Review, 46, 241-262.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1078087409360509 .
Sandra Gonzalez-Bailon (2009). Opening the Black Box of Link Formation: Social Factors Underlying the Structure of the Web, Social Networks, 31, 271-280.
Adam Douglas Henry, Mark Lubell, and Michael McCoy (2010). Belief Systems and Social Capital as Drivers of Policy Network Structure: The Case of California Regional Planning. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 419-444.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq042
Lubbers, Miranda J., and Snijders, Tom A.B. (2007), A comparison of various approaches to the exponential random graph model: A reanalysis of 102 student networks in school classes. Social Networks 29, 489-507.
Birgit Pauksztat, Christian Steglich, and Rafael Wittek (2011), Who speaks up to whom? A relational approach to employee voice. Social Networks 33, 303-316. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.10.001
Paul W. Thurner and Martin Binder (2008), European Union transgovernmental networks: The emergence of a new political space beyond the nation-state? European Journal of Political Research,
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00825.x
Ruud van der Horst, Tom Snijders, Beate Völker, and Marinus Spreen (2010). Social Interaction Related to the Functioning of Forensic Psychiatric Inpatients. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 10, 339-359.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2010.481238
Paola Zappa (2011). The network structure of knowledge sharing among physicians. Quality and Quantity, 45, 1109-1126.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9494-1

In French: Dynamics of networks

Emmanuel Lazega, Lise Mounier, Tom Snijders, et Paola Tubaro (2008), Réseaux et controverses: de l'effet des normes sur la dynamique des structures. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49, 467-498.

In French: exponential random graph models

Christophe Boschet and Tina Rambonilaza (2010), Les mécanismes de coordination dans les réseaux sociaux : un cadre analytique de la dynamique territoriale. Economie régionale et urbaine (3/2010), 569-593.

In Spanish: Dynamics of networks

Chris Baerveldt, Gerhard G. van de Bunt, Ainhoa de Federico (2010), Cómo y por qué los modelos de selección difieren entre estudiantes. La influencia potencial de los tamaños de la red, el nivel de información y la pertenencia a grupos . REDES Vol. 19, p. 272-300.
This is not an empirical application, but a theoretical study relevant to model selection.
Also available in English; see above.
de Federico de la Rua, Ainhoa, La dinamica de las redes de amistad. La eleccion de amigos en el programa Erasmus. REDES 4.3, (June 2003). http://revista-redes.rediris.es

In Dutch: Dynamics of networks and behavior.

Ruben de Cuyper, Frank Weerman en Stijn Ruiter (2009), De co-evolutie van vriendschapsrelaties en delinquent gedrag onder Nederlandse jongeren. Mens en Maatschappij, 84, 300-328.

Back to the main Siena page

	Applications of Siena


	Next to the illustrations in the methodological articles, applications of Siena can be found in the following articles.


	Articles about dynamics of networks. Filip Agneessens and Rafael Wittek, (2011), Where do intra-organizational advice relations come from? The role of informal status and social capital in social exchange. Social Networks, 33, in press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.04.002. Andrew, Simon, Institutional Ties, Interlocal Contractual Arrangements, and the Dynamic of Metropolitan Governance. PhD thesis, Florida State University (2006). Andrew, Simon, Regional integration through contracting networks. An empirical analysis of institutional collection action framework. Urban Affairs Review 44 (2009), 378-402. Chris Baerveldt, Gerhard G. van de Bunt, Ainhoa de Federico (2010), Why and how selection patterns in classroom networks differ between students. The potential influence of networks size preferences, level of information, and group membership. REDES Vol. 19, p. 272-300. This is not an empirical application, but a theoretical study relevant to model selection. Also available in Spanish; see below. Checkley, Matthew, and Steglich, Christian E.G. (2007). Partners in power: Job mobility and dynamic deal-making. European Management Review Vol.4 (2007), 161-171. Chu-Shore, Jesse (2010). Homogenization and specialization effects of international trade: are cultural goods exceptional? World Development 38, 37-47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.001. de Nooy, Wouter, The dynamics of artistic prestige. Poetics, 30 (2002), 147-167. Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Christian Berger, and Siegwart Lindenberg (2011). Do Physical and Relational Aggression Explain Adolescents' Friendship Selection? The Competing Roles of Network Characteristics, Gender, and Social Status. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 1-13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.20402. J.J. Ebbers and N.M. Wijnberg (2010). Disentangling the effects of reputation and network position on the evolution of alliance networks. Strategic Organization, 8 (3), 255-275. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476127010381102 J.C. Johnson, J.J. Luczkovich. S.P. Borgatti, and T.A.B. Snijders. Using social network analysis tools in ecology: Markov process transition models applied to the seasonal trophic network dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay. Ecological Modeling 220 (2009) 3133-3140. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.037. Ko, P.-C., and Buskens, V (2011). Dynamics of adolescent friendships: The interplay between structure and gender. Proceedings - 2011 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2011, pp. 313-320. DOI: : http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2011.30. Luka Kronegger, Franc Mali, Anuška Ferligoj and Patrick Doreian (2011). Collaboration structures in Slovenian scientific communities. Scientometrics, in press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0493-8. Lazega, E., Lemercier, C., and Mounier, L. (2006). A Spinning top model of formal organization and informal behavior: dynamics of advice networks among judges in a commercial court. European Management Review, 3, 113-122. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500058. Lazega, E., Mounier, L., Snijders, T.A.B., and Tubaro, P. (2010). Norms, status and the dynamics of advice networks: A case study. Social Networks, 33, in press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.12.001. Emmanuel Lazega, Saraï Sapulete, and Lise Mounier (2011). Structural stability regardless of membership turnover? The added value of blockmodelling in the analysis of network evolution. Quality and Quantity, 45, 129-144. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9295-y. A. Mehra, J. Marineau, A.B. Lopes, and T.K. Dass (2009). The coevolution of friendship and leadership networks in small groups. In G.B. Graen and J.A. Graen (eds), Predator's Game-Changing Designs: Research-Based Tools. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 145-162. Paulina Preciado, Tom A.B. Snijders, William J. Burk, Håkan Stattin, and Margaret Kerr (2012). Does proximity matter? Distance dependence of adolescent friendships. Social Networks, 34, 18-31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.01.002. Schaefer, David R., Olga Kornienko and Andrew M. Fox (2011). Misery Does not Love Company: Network Selection Mechanisms and Depression Homophily. American Sociological Review 76, 764-785. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003122411420813. David R. Schaefer, John M. Light, Richard A. Fabes, Laura D. Hanish, Carol Lynn Martin (2010). Fundamental principles of network formation among preschool children. Social Networks, 32, 61-71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.04.003. Mathias Smångs (2010). Delinquency, Social Skills and the Structure of Peer Relations: Assessing Criminological Theories by Social Network Theory. Social Forces 89, 609-632. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0069. T.W. Valente, K. Fujimoto, P. Palmer, and S.P. Tanjasiri (2010). A network assessment of community-based participatory research: Linking communities and universities to reduce cancer disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1319-1325. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.171116 van de Bunt, G.G., Friends by Choice. An Actor-Oriented Statistical Network Model for Friendship Networks Through Time. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, 1999. van de Bunt, G.G. and Groenewegen, P., An actor-oriented dynamic network approach: The case of interorganizational network evolution. Organizational Research Methods 10 (2007), 463-482. van de Bunt, G.G., Van Duijn, M.A.J., and Snijders, T.A.B., Friendship networks through time: An actor-oriented statistical network model. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 5 (1999), 167-192. van de Bunt, G.G., Wittek, R.P.M., and de Klepper M.C., The Evolution of intra-organizational trust networks; The case of a German paper factory: an empirical test of six trust mechanisms. International Sociology 20 (2005), 339-369. van Duijn, Marijtje A.J., Zeggelink, Evelien P.H., Huisman, Mark, Stokman, Frans N., and Wasseur, Frans W. Evolution of sociology freshmen into a friendship network. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 27 (2003), 153-191. Maarten Van Zalk / Selfhout, William Burk, Susan Branje, Jaap Denissen, Marcel van Aken, and Wim Meeus (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and big five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78, 509-538. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00625.x. T. Camber Warren (2010). The geometry of security: Modeling interstate alliances as evolving networks. Journal of Peace Research, 47, 697-709. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022343310386270. Whitbread, R., Fonti, F., Steglich, Ch. and Contractor, N. (2011). From micro-actions to macro-structure: A structurational approach to the evolution of organizational networks. Human Communication Research, 37, 404-433. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01404.x.


	Articles about dynamics of personal networks. Miranda J. Lubbers, Jose Luis Molina, Jurgen Lerner, Ulrik Brandes, Javier Avila, Christopher McCarty (2010). Longitudinal analysis of personal networks. The case of Argentinean migrants in Spain. Social Networks, 32, 91-104. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.05.001.


	Articles about dynamics of networks and behavior. Tutorial / review articles Veenstra, R., and Dijkstra, J.K. (2011). Transformations in Peer Networks. Chapter 7 (pp. 135-154) in B. Laursen and W.A. Collins (eds.), Relationship Pathways: From Adolescence to Young Adulthood. New York: Sage. Veenstra, R., and Steglich, C. (2012). Actor-based model for network and behavior dynamics: A tool to examine selection and influence processes. Chapter 34 (pp. 598-618) in B. Laursen, T. D. Little, and N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods. New York: Guilford Press. Research articles Filip Agneessens and Rafael Wittek, (2008), Social capital and employee well-being: disentangling intrapersonal and interpersonal selection and influence mechanisms. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49, 613-637. Chris Baerveldt, Beate Völker, and Ronan Van Rossem (2008). Revisiting selection and influence: an inquiry into the friendship networks of high school students and their association with delinquency. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 50, 559-587. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.50.5.559. (Note: the quadratic shape function may have been mistakenly omitted from the specification of the behavior objective function in the analyses reported here.) Ramiro Berardo and John T. Scholz, (2010), Self-Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection and Cooperation in Estuaries. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 632-649. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.x. William J. Burk, Margaret Kerr, and Håkan Stattin (2008), The co-evolution of early adolescent friendship networks, school involvement, and delinquent behaviors. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49, 499-522. Burk, William J., Steglich, Christian E.G., and Snijders, Tom A.B. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 397-404. Burk, W.J., Van der Vorst, H., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2012). Alcohol intoxication frequency and friendship dynamics: Selection and socialization in early, mid- and late adolescent peer networks. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 89-98. Maurits de Klepper, Ed Sleebos, Gerhard van de Bunt, and Filip Agneessens (2010). Similarity in friendship networks: Selection or influence? The effect of constraining contexts and non-visible individual attributes. Social Networks, 32, 82-90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.06.003. Kayla de la Haye, Garry Robins, Philip Mohr, and Carlene Wilson (2011). Homophily and Contagion as Explanations for Weight Similarities Among Adolescent Friends. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49, 421-427. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.02.008. Kayla de la Haye, Garry Robins, Philip Mohr, and Carlene Wilson. How physical activity shapes, and is shaped by, adolescent friendships (2011). Social Science and Medicine, 73, 719-728. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.023. Dijkstra, J.K., Gest, S.D., Lindenberg, S., Veenstra, R., and Cillessen, A.H.N. (2011). The emergence of weapon carrying in peer context. Testing three explanations: the role of aggression, victimization, and friends. Journal of Adolescent Health, in press. Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., Veenstra, R., Steglich, C., Isaacs, J., Card, N. A. and Hodges, E. V. E. (2010). Influence and selection processes in weapon carrying during adolescence: The roles of status, aggression, and vulnerability. Criminology, 48, 187-220. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00183.x. Cécile Emery, Kim Daniloski, and Anne Hamby (2011). The reciprocal effects of self-view as a leader and leadership emergence. Small Group Research, 42, 199-224. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496410389494. Jennifer Flashman (2009). You've got a friend: Adolescent friendship choices, dynamics, and implications for future stratification. PhD dissertation, UCLA, 2009. (Publication No. AAT 3388161) http://gradworks.umi.com/33/88/3388161.htm. Jennifer Flashman (2011). Academic Achievement and Its Impact on Friend Dynamics. Sociology of Education, in press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1177/0038040711417014. Thomas N. Friemel (2011). Network dynamics of television use in school classes. Social Networks, in press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.08.002. Danica Vukadinovic Greetham, Robert Hurling, Gabrielle Osborne, and Alex Linley (2011). Social Networks and Positive and Negative Affect. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 22, 4-13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.051. Margaret Kerr, Maarten Van Zalk, and Håkan Stattin (2011). Psychopathic traits moderate peer influence on adolescent delinquency. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, in press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02492.x. Noona Kiuru, William J. Burk, Brett Laursen, Katariina Salmela-Aro, and Jari-Erik Nurmi (2010). Pressure to drink but not to smoke: Disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 801-812. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.07.006 Andrea B. Knecht, William J. Burk, Jeroen Weesie, and Christian E. G. Steglich (2010). Friendship and alcohol use in early adolescence: A multilevel social network approach, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 475-487. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00685.x Andrea Knecht, Tom A. B. Snijders, Chris Baerveldt, Christian E. G. Steglich, and Werner Raub (2010). Friendship and Delinquency: Selection and Influence Processes in Early Adolescence, Social Development, 19, 494-514. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00564.x. Brett Laursen, Danielle Pop, William J. Burk, Margaret Kerr, and Håkan Stattin (2008). Incorporating interdependence into developmental research: Examples from the study of homophily and heterogeneity. In: Noel A. Card, James P. Selig, and Todd D. Little, Modeling Dyadic and Interdependent Data in the Developmental and Behavioral Sciences. New York and London: Routledge, p. 11-37. Kevin Lewis (2011). The co-evolution of social network ties and online privacy behavior. Pp. 91-109 in Privacy Online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-Disclosure in the Social Web, Part 1, edited by S. Trepte and L. Reinecke. Heidelberg and New York: Springer. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_8. Kevin Lewis, Marco Gonzalez, and Jason Kaufman (2011). Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. PNAS 2011; published ahead of print December 19, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109739109. John M. Light, Thomas J. Dishion (2007). Early adolescent antisocial behavior and peer rejection: A dynamic test of a developmental process. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 118, 77-89. Alessandro Lomi, Tom A.B. Snijders, Christian E.G. Steglich, and Vanina Jasmine Torló (2011). Why Are Some More Peer Than Others? Evidence from a Longitudinal Study of Social Networks and Individual Academic Performance. Social Science Research, 40, 1506-1520. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.010. Miranda J. Lubbers, Tom A.B. Snijders, and Margaretha P.C. van der Werf (2011). Dynamics of Peer Relationships Across the First Two Years of Junior High as a Function of Gender and Changes in Classroom Composition. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 488-504. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00688.x . Sterett H. Mercer and Melissa A. Derosier (2010). Selection and Socialization of Internalizing Problems in Middle Childhood. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 1031-1056. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.9.1031. L. Mercken, T.A.B. Snijders, C. Steglich, E. Vartiainen, H. de Vries (2010). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Social Networks, 32, 72-81. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.005. L. Mercken, T.A.B. Snijders, C. Steglich, E. Vartiainen, H. de Vries (2010). Smoking-based selection and influence in gender-segregated friendship networks: a social network analysis of adolescent smoking . Addiction, 105, 1280-1289. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02930.x. Liesbeth Mercken, Tom A.B. Snijders, Christian Steglich, Hein de Vries (2009). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior: Social network analyses in six European countries. Social Science and Medicine (2009), 69, 1506-1514. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.003. Liesbeth Mercken, Christian Steglich, Ronald Knibbe, Hein de Vries (2012). Dynamics of Friendship Networks and Alcohol Use in Early and Mid-Adolescence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 99-110. Ojanen, T., Sijtsema, J. J., Hawley, P. H., and Little, T. D. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in early adolescents' friendship development: Friendship selection, influence, and prospective friendship quality. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 837-851. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.08.004. Pearson, Michael, Steglich, Christian, and Snijders, Tom (2006). Homophily and assimilation among sport-active adolescent substance users. Connections 27(1), 47-63. (Note: the quadratic shape function has mistakenly been omitted from the specification of the behavior objective function in the analyses reported here.) Jelle J. Sijtsema, Tiina Ojanen, Rene Veenstra, Siegwart Lindenberg, Patricia H. Hawley, and Todd D. Little (2010). Forms and functions of aggression in adolescent friendship selection and influence: A longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development 19, 515-534. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00566.x. Christian Steglich, Philip Sinclair, Jo Holliday, Laurence Moore (2010). Actor-based analysis of peer influence in A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial (ASSIST). Social Networks, in press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.07.001. Steglich, C.E.G., Snijders, T.A.B. and West, P. (2006), Applying SIENA: An illustrative analysis of the co-evolution of adolescents' friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption. Methodology, 2, 48-56. (Note: the quadratic shape function has mistakenly been omitted from the specification of the behavior objective function in the analyses reported here.) Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr, Susan T. Branje, Håkan Stattin, and Wim H.J. Meeus (2010). It Takes Three: Selection, Influence, and De-Selection Processes of Depression in Adolescent Friendship Networks. Developmental Psychology, 46, 927-938. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019661. Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr, Susan T. Branje, Håkan Stattin, and Wim H.J. Meeus (2010). Peer Contagion and Adolescent Depression: The Role of Failure Anticipation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39, 837-848. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2010.517164. Nejra Van Zalk, Maarten Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr and Håkan Stattin (2011). Social Anxiety as a Basis for Friendship Selection and Socialization in Adolescents' Social Networks. Journal of Personality, 79, 499-526. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00682.x. Frank Weerman (2011). Delinquent Peers in Context: A Longitudinal Network Analysis of Selection and Influence Effects. Criminology, 49, 253-286. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00223.x.


	Articles about exponential random graph models Richard C. Feiock, In Won Lee, Hyung Jun Park and Keon-Hyung Lee (2010). Collaboration Networks Among Local Elected Officials: Information, Commitment, and Risk Aversion. Urban Affairs Review, 46, 241-262. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1078087409360509 . Sandra Gonzalez-Bailon (2009). Opening the Black Box of Link Formation: Social Factors Underlying the Structure of the Web, Social Networks, 31, 271-280. Adam Douglas Henry, Mark Lubell, and Michael McCoy (2010). Belief Systems and Social Capital as Drivers of Policy Network Structure: The Case of California Regional Planning. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 419-444. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq042 Lubbers, Miranda J., and Snijders, Tom A.B. (2007), A comparison of various approaches to the exponential random graph model: A reanalysis of 102 student networks in school classes. Social Networks 29, 489-507. Birgit Pauksztat, Christian Steglich, and Rafael Wittek (2011), Who speaks up to whom? A relational approach to employee voice. Social Networks 33, 303-316. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.10.001 Paul W. Thurner and Martin Binder (2008), European Union transgovernmental networks: The emergence of a new political space beyond the nation-state? European Journal of Political Research, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00825.x Ruud van der Horst, Tom Snijders, Beate Völker, and Marinus Spreen (2010). Social Interaction Related to the Functioning of Forensic Psychiatric Inpatients. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 10, 339-359. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2010.481238 Paola Zappa (2011). The network structure of knowledge sharing among physicians. Quality and Quantity, 45, 1109-1126. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9494-1


	In French: Dynamics of networks Emmanuel Lazega, Lise Mounier, Tom Snijders, et Paola Tubaro (2008), Réseaux et controverses: de l'effet des normes sur la dynamique des structures. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49, 467-498. In French: exponential random graph models Christophe Boschet and Tina Rambonilaza (2010), Les mécanismes de coordination dans les réseaux sociaux : un cadre analytique de la dynamique territoriale. Economie régionale et urbaine (3/2010), 569-593. In Spanish: Dynamics of networks Chris Baerveldt, Gerhard G. van de Bunt, Ainhoa de Federico (2010), Cómo y por qué los modelos de selección difieren entre estudiantes. La influencia potencial de los tamaños de la red, el nivel de información y la pertenencia a grupos . REDES Vol. 19, p. 272-300. This is not an empirical application, but a theoretical study relevant to model selection. Also available in English; see above. de Federico de la Rua, Ainhoa, La dinamica de las redes de amistad. La eleccion de amigos en el programa Erasmus. REDES 4.3, (June 2003). http://revista-redes.rediris.es


	In Dutch: Dynamics of networks and behavior. Ruben de Cuyper, Frank Weerman en Stijn Ruiter (2009), De co-evolutie van vriendschapsrelaties en delinquent gedrag onder Nederlandse jongeren. Mens en Maatschappij, 84, 300-328.


	Back to the main Siena page