Back to the main Siena page

Applications of Siena


Contents

Categories are not perfect....

  1. Dynamics of Networks
  2. Dynamics of Networks and Behavior
  3. Two-mode Networks
  4. Multivariate and Valued Networks
  5. Stationary SAOMS ('Stationary Stochastic Actor-oriented Models')
  6. Exponential Random Graph Models
  7. In Chinese
  8. In Dutch
  9. In French
  10. In Hungarian
  11. In Russian
  12. In Spanish
  13. In Italian



Next to the illustrations in the methodological articles, applications of Siena can be found in the following articles.



Articles about dynamics of networks

   Tutorial / review articles

  • David N. Fisher, Amiyaal Ilany, Matthew J. Silk and Tom Tregenza (2017). Analysing animal social network dynamics: the potential of stochastic actor-oriented models. Journal of Animal Ecology, 86, 202-212.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12630.
  • Yuval Kalish (2020). Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models for the Co-Evolution of Networks and Behavior: An Introduction and Tutorial. Organizational Research Methods, 23, 511-534.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428118825300
  • Tom A.B. Snijders, Gerhard G. van de Bunt, and Christian E.G. Steglich (2010). Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44-60.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004
  • Ralf Wölfer, Nadira S. Faber, and Miles Hewstone (2015). Social network analysis in the science of groups: Cross-sectional and longitudinal applications for studying intra-and intergroup behavior. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19, 45-61.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000021

   Research articles


Articles about Multilevel (Multi-Group) Analysis of Network Dynamics




Articles about dynamics of personal networks.

  • Miranda J. Lubbers, Jose Luis Molina, Jurgen Lerner, Ulrik Brandes, Javier Avila, Christopher McCarty (2010). Longitudinal analysis of personal networks. The case of Argentinean migrants in Spain. Social Networks, 32, 91-104.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.05.001.




Articles about dynamics of networks and behavior.

   Tutorial / review articles

  • Jasperina Brouwer and Dominik E. Froehlich (2020). Co-Evolution Models of Longitudinally Measured Interactions. In: Analyzing Group Interactions; A Guidebook for Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods, edited by Matthias Huber and Dominik E. Froehlich. Abingdon: Routledge.
    ISBN: 978-0-367-32111-6.
  • Yuval Kalish (2020). Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models for the Co-Evolution of Networks and Behavior: An Introduction and Tutorial. Organizational Research Methods, 23, 511-534.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428118825300
  • Frank Kalter (2016). Social Network Analysis in the Study of Ethnic Inequalities. In Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (eds R. A. Scott and S. M. Kosslyn).
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0397
  • Jennifer Watling Neal and René Veenstra (2021). Network selection and influence effects on children's and adolescents' internalizing behaviors and peer victimization: A systematic review. Developmental Review 59, 100944.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100944
  • Craig Rawlings, Jeffrey A. Smith, James Moody, and Daniel McFarland (2023). Network Analysis: Integrating Social Network Theory, Method, and Application with R. Cambridge University Press.
    Chapter 15: Social Influence: Coevolution of Networks and Behaviors.
    Associated with this book are R tutorials: here is the tutorial for Chapter 15.
  • Tom A.B. Snijders, Gerhard G. van de Bunt, and Christian E.G. Steglich (2010). Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44-60.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004
  • Veenstra, R., Bertogna, T., and Laninga-Wijnen, L. (2024). The growth of longitudinal social network analysis: A review of the key data sets and topics in research on child and adolescent development. In M. E. Feinberg & D. W. Osgood (Eds.), Teen Friendship Networks, Development, and Risky Behavior (pp. 326-352).
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197602317.003.0014
  • Veenstra, R., and Dijkstra, J.K. (2011). Transformations in Peer Networks. Chapter 7 (pp. 135-154) in B. Laursen and W.A. Collins (eds.), Relationship Pathways: From Adolescence to Young Adulthood. New York: Sage.
  • René Veenstra, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, and Derek A. Kreager (2018). Pathways, networks, and norms: A sociological perspective on peer research. In W.M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K.H. Rubin (eds.) Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups, 2nd edition (pp.45-63). New York: Guilford.
    ISBN 9781462525010
  • Veenstra, R. and Huitsing, G. (2021). Social network approaches to bullying and victimization. In P. K. Smith, & J. O’Higgins Norman (eds.). The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Bullying. Volume 1 (pp. 196-214). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Veenstra, R., and Steglich, C. (2012). Actor-based model for network and behavior dynamics: A tool to examine selection and influence processes. Chapter 34 (pp. 598-618) in B. Laursen, T. D. Little, and N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Ralf Wölfer, Nadira S. Faber, and Miles Hewstone (2015). Social network analysis in the science of groups: Cross-sectional and longitudinal applications for studying intra-and intergroup behavior. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19, 45-61.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000021

   Meta-analyses of Siena results

   Special issue

   Research articles

  • jimi adams and David R. Schaefer (2016). How Initial Prevalence Moderates Network-based Smoking Change: Estimating Contextual Effects with Stochastic Actor-based Models. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 57, 22-38.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022146515627848
  • Rasool Lavaei Adaryani, Khalil Kalantari, Ali Asadi, Amir Alambeigi, Hesamedin Gholami, and Naser Seifollahi (2022). Information sharing antecedents in the supply chain: a dynamic network perspective. Operations Management Research, 16, 887–903.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00337-w
  • Filip Agneessens and Rafael Wittek (2008), Social capital and employee well-being: disentangling intrapersonal and interpersonal selection and influence mechanisms. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49, 613-637.
  • Yoshiyuki Arata, Abhijit Chakraborty, Yoshi Fujiwara, Hiroyasu Inoue, Hazem Krichene and Masaaki Terai (2018). Shock Propagation Through Customer-Supplier Relationships: An Application of the Stochastic Actor-Oriented Model. International Workshop on Complex Networks and their Applications, 1100-1110.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72150-7_89
  • Laura Baams, Geertjan Overbeek, Daphne van de Bongardt, Ellen Reitz, Judith Semon Dubas, Marcel van Aken (2015). Adolescents' and their friends' sexual behavior and intention: Selection effects of personality dimensions. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 2-12.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.009.
  • Chris Baerveldt, Beate Völker, and Ronan Van Rossem (2008). Revisiting selection and influence: an inquiry into the friendship networks of high school students and their association with delinquency. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 50, 559-587.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.50.5.559.
    (Note: the quadratic shape function may have been mistakenly omitted from the specification of the behavior objective function in the analyses reported here.)
  • Kai Becker (2023). In it together: How peers and mentors connect and influence entrepreneurs. PhD Thesis, fully internal, University of Amsterdam.
  • Kai Becker, Joris J. Ebbers, and Yuval Engel (2023). Network to passion or passion to network? Disentangling entrepreneurial passion selection and contagion effects among peers and teams in a startup accelerator. Journal of Business Venturing, 38, 106299.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106299
  • Richard A. Benton (2016). Corporate governance and nested authority: Cohesive network structure, actor-driven mechanisms, and the balance of power in American corporations. American Journal of Sociology, 122, 661-713.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/689397

    Note: this article contains a study of the co-evolution of a two-mode network (firms by directors) and 'behavior' (governance index).

  • Ramiro Berardo and John T. Scholz, (2010), Self-Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection and Cooperation in Estuaries. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 632-649.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.x.
  • Christian Berger, Mariola C. Gremmen, Diego Palacios and Eduardo Franco (2019). "Would you be my friend?": Friendship selection and contagion processes of early adolescents who experience victimization. The Journal of Early Adolescence 39(9), 1286-1310.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618824753
  • Per Block and Stephanie Burnett Heyes (2022). Sharing the Load: Contagion and Tolerance of Mood in Social Networks. Emotion, 22(6), 1193-1207.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000952
  • Ted J. Bobak (2022). Complex Contexts within Oxford. DePaul University, College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations, 423.
  • Ted J. Bobak, John M. Majer, and Leonard A. Jason (2023). Complex Contexts Within Oxford Houses: Psychiatrically Comorbid Social Networks. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, .
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2023.2181120
  • Mohamed Bin Abderrazek Boukhris(2019). Uncertainty versus learning: a network approach for corporate strategic partner selection. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 9(11), 554-569.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2019.911.554.569
  • Anna Bravo, Rosario Ortega-Ruiz, Rene Veenstra, Maaike C. Engels, and Eva M. Romera, (2022). Friendship selection and influence processes for popularity in early and mid-adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 94, 45- 56.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12004
  • Chloe Bracegirdle, Nils Karl Reimer, Danny Osborne, Chris G. Sibley, Ralf Wölfer, and Nikhil Kumar Sengupta (2023). The Socialization of Perceived Discrimination in Ethnic Minority Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes, 125(3), 571–589.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000426
  • Chloe Bracegirdle, Nils Karl Reimer, Maarten van Zalk, Miles Hewstone, and Ralf Wölfer (2021). Disentangling Contact and Socialization Effects on Outgroup Attitudes in Diverse Friendship Networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and Social Cognition, 122(1), 1-15.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000240
  • Arturo Briseno, Bryan W. Husted and Jorge M. Rocha (2019). Methodological problems in research on the diffusion of management practices. Contaduria y Administracion, 64(1), 1-15.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2018.1251
  • Jasperina Brouwer, Carlos A. de Matos Fernandes, Christian E.G. Steglich, Ellen P.W.A. Jansen, W.H. Adriaan Hofman, and Andreas Flache (2022). The development of peer networks and academic performance in learning communities in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101603.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101603
  • Jasperina Brouwer and Carlos A. de Matos Fernandes (2023). Using Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models to Explain Collaboration Intentionality as a Prerequisite for Peer Feedback and Learning in Networks. In: Noroozi, O., De Wever, B. (eds), The Power of Peer Learning. Social Interaction in Learning and Development. Cham: Springer.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_5
  • Meg Bruening, Irene van Woerden, David R. Schaefer, Daniel Hruschka, Alexandra Brewis, Corrie M. Whisner, Genevieve F. Dunton, Michael Todd, Punam Ohri-Vachaspati and Melissa N. Laska (2018). Friendship as a social mechanism influencing body mass index (BMI) among emerging adults. PLOS ONE, 13(12), e0208894.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208894
  • William J. Burk, Margaret Kerr, and Håkan Stattin (2008), The co-evolution of early adolescent friendship networks, school involvement, and delinquent behaviors. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49, 499-522.
  • Burk, William J., Steglich, Christian E.G., and Snijders, Tom A.B. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 397-404.
  • Tobias Buchmann and Andreas Pyka (2015). The evolution of innovation networks: the case of a publicly funded German automotive network. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 24, 114-139.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.897860.
  • Burk, W.J., Van der Vorst, H., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2012). Alcohol intoxication frequency and friendship dynamics: Selection and socialization in early, mid- and late adolescent peer networks. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 89-98.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2012.73.89.
  • Caravita, S.C.S., Sijtsema, J.J., Rambaran, J.A., and Gini, G. (2014). Peer Influences on Moral Disengagement in Late Childhood and Early Adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(2), 193-207.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9953-1.
  • Victor Chang, Karl Hall, Qianwen Ariel Xu, Le Minh Thao Doan, and Zhi Wang (2022). A social network analysis of two networks: Adolescent school network and Bitcoin trader network. Decision Analytics Journal, 3, 100065.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100065.
  • Matthew Checkley, Christian Steglich, Duncan Angwin, and Richard Endersby (2014). Firm Performance and the Evolution of Cooperative Interfirm Networks: UK Venture Capital Syndication. Strategic Change, 23, 107-118.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsc.1963.
  • Angela Chow, Noona Kiuru, Philip D. Parker, Jacquelynne C. Eccles and Katariina Salmela-Aro (2018). Development of friendship and task values in a new school: Friend selection for the arts and physical education but socialization for academic subjects. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1966-1977.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0894-6
  • Olga Chyzh (2016). Dangerous liaisons: An endogenous model of international trade and human rights. Journal of Peace Research, 53(3), 409-423.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316629605
  • Jan Cieciuch, Maria Kwiatkowska, Martin Kindschi, Eldad Davidov, and René Algesheimer (2024). Peers and value preferences among adolescents in school classes: a social network and longitudinal approach. European Journal of Psychology of Education.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00878-7
  • Viktor Dahl and Maarten van Zalk (2014). Peer Networks and the Development of Illegal Political Behavior Among Adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24, 399-409.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12072.
  • Joao R. Daniel, Antonio J. Santos, Carla Fernandes and Brian E. Vaughn (2019). Network dynamics of affiliative ties in preschool peer groups. Social Networks, 57, 63-69.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.12.005
  • Marissa Davila and Olga Kornienko (2022). Making, keeping, and influencing friends: The role of fear of negative evaluation and gender in adolescent networks. School Psychology, 37, 455-466.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000481
  • Dawn DeLay, Mengqian Shen, Rachel E. Cook, Siman Zhao, Handrea Logis, and Doran C. French (2023). Peers influence the tobacco and alcohol use of Chinese adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 33, 591-602.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12828
  • Dawn DeLay, Brett Laursen, Noona Kiuru, Katariina Salmela-Aro and Jari-Erik Nurmi (2013). Selecting and Retaining Friends on the Basis of Cigarette Smoking Similarity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 464-473.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12017.
  • Maurits de Klepper, Ed Sleebos, Gerhard van de Bunt, and Filip Agneessens (2010). Similarity in friendship networks: Selection or influence? The effect of constraining contexts and non-visible individual attributes. Social Networks, 32, 82-90.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.06.003
  • Maurits de Klepper, Giuseppe (Joe) Labianca, Ed Sleebos, and Filip Agneessens (2017). Sociometric Status and Peer Control Attempts: A Multiple Status Hierarchies Approach. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 1-31.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joms.12242
  • Kayla de la Haye, Garry Robins, Philip Mohr, and Carlene Wilson (2011). Homophily and Contagion as Explanations for Weight Similarities Among Adolescent Friends. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49, 421-427.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.02.008
  • Kayla de la Haye, Garry Robins, Philip Mohr, and Carlene Wilson (2011). How physical activity shapes, and is shaped by, adolescent friendships. Social Science and Medicine, 73, 719-728.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.023
  • Kayla de la Haye, Harold D. Green Jr., David P. Kennedy, Michael S. Pollard and Joan S. Tucker (2013). Selection and Influence Mechanisms Associated With Marijuana Initiation and Use in Adolescent Friendship Networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 474-486.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12018
  • Kayla de la Haye, Harold D. Green Jr., Michael S. Pollard, David P. Kennedy, and Joan S. Tucker (2015). Befriending risky peers: Factors driving adolescents' selection of friends with similar marijuana use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 1914-1928.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0210-z
  • Kayla de la Haye, Garry Robins, Philip Mohr and Carlene Wilson (2013). Adolescents' Intake of Junk Food: Processes and Mechanisms Driving Consumption Similarities Among Friends. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 524-536.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12045
  • Kayla de la Haye, Heesung Shin, George G. Vega Yon and Thomas W. Valente (2019). Smoking diffusion through networks of diverse, urban American adolescents over the high school period. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 60(3), 362-376.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146519870521
  • Dawn DeLay, William J. Burk, and Brett Laursen (2022). Assessing peer influence and susceptibility to peer influence using individual and dyadic moderators in a social network context: The case of adolescent alcohol misuse. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46, 208-221.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254221084102
  • Dawn DeLay, Laura D. Hanish, Linlin Zhang and Carol L. Martin (2016). Assessing the Impact of Homophobic Name Calling on Early Adolescent Mental Health: A Longitudinal Social Network Analysis of Competing Peer Influence Effects. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 955-969.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0598-8
  • Dawn DeLay, Carol Lynn Martin, Rachel E. Cook and Laura D. Hanish (2018). The Influence of Peers During Adolescence: Does Homophobic Name Calling by Peers Change Gender Identity? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 636-649.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0749-6
  • Julio Díaz-José, Roberto Rendón-Medel, Jorge Aguilar-Ávila, Manrrubio Muñoz-Rodríguez (2013). Dynamic analysis of networks in the diffusion of agricultural innovations Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 4(7), 1095-1102.
    This article was published simultaneously in an English and a Spanish version.
  • Sara E. Dieterich (2015). The Coevolution of Adolescent Friendship Networks and School Outcomes. PhD dissertation, Department of Psychology, Colorado State University.
  • Jan K. Dijkstra and Christian Berger (2017). Friendship Selection and Influence Processes for Physical Aggression and Prosociality: Differences between Single-Sex and Mixed-Sex Contexts. Sex Roles, 78, 625-636.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0818-z
  • Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Christian Berger, and Siegwart Lindenberg (2011). Do physical and relational aggression explain adolescents' friendship selection? The competing roles of network characteristics, gender, and social status. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 1-13.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.20402
  • Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Antonius H.N. Cillessen, and Casey Borch (2013). Popularity and Adolescent Friendship Networks: Selection and Influence Dynamics. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1242-1252.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030098
  • Dijkstra, J.K., Gest, S.D., Lindenberg, S., Veenstra, R., and Cillessen, A.H.N. (2012). The emergence of weapon carrying in peer context. Testing three explanations: the role of aggression, victimization, and friends. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 371-376.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.08.010
  • Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., Veenstra, R., Steglich, C., Isaacs, J., Card, N. A. and Hodges, E. V. E. (2010). Influence and selection processes in weapon carrying during adolescence: The roles of status, aggression, and vulnerability. Criminology, 48, 187-220.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00183.x
  • Dan Ding, Tuan Q. Phan, Prasanta Bhattacharya and Xuesong Lu (2018). The impact of peer influence on academic performance: A three-stage co-evolution model. Thirty ninth International Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco 2018
    https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1097&context=icis2018
  • Thomas J. Dishion (2013). Stochastic Agent-Based Modeling of Influence and Selection in Adolescence: Current Status and Future Directions in Understanding the Dynamics of Peer Contagion. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 596-603.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12068
  • Sofia Dokuka, Diliara Valeeva, and Maria Yudkevich (2015). The Diffusion of Academic Achievements: Social Selection and Influence in Student Networks. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 65/SOC/2015. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2658031 or https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2658031.
  • Sofia Dokuka, Diliara Valeeva and Maria Yudkevich (2020). How academic achievement spreads: The role of distinct social networks in academic performance diffusion. Plos One, 15(7).
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236737
  • Bart Duriez, Matteo Giletta, Peter Kuppens, and Maarten Vansteenkiste (2013). Extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits and peer dynamics: Selection and influence processes among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 925-933.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.07.009
  • Scott W. Duxbury and Dana L. Haynie (2020). School suspension and social selection: Labeling, network change, and adolescent, academic achievement. Social Science Research 85, 102365.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102365
  • Joris J. Ebbers and Nachoem M. Wijnberg (2018). The co-evolution of social networks and selection system orientations as core constituents of institutional logics of future entrepreneurs at school. Journal of Business Venturing, 34, 558-577.
    DOI: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088390261830051X
  • Cécile Emery (2012). Uncovering the role of emotional abilities in leadership emergence. A longitudinal analysis of leadership networks. Social Networks,34, 429-437
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.02.001
  • Cécile Emery, Kim Daniloski, and Anne Hamby (2011). The reciprocal effects of self-view as a leader and leadership emergence. Small Group Research, 42, 199-224.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496410389494
  • Cécile Emery, Thomas S. Calvard, and Meghan E. Pierce (2013). Leadership as an emergent group process: A social network study of personality and leadership. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 28-45.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430212461835
  • Susan T. Ennett, Robert W. Faris, Andrea M. Hussong, Nisha Gottfredson and Veronica Cole (2018). Depressive symptomology as a moderator of friend selection and influence on substance use involvement: Estimates from grades 6 to 12 in six longitudinal school-based social networks. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 2337-2352.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0915-5
  • Ceren Erdem (2017). Investigating the dynamic nature of psychological contracts: A study of the coevolution of newcomers' psychological contracts and social networks.
    Doctoral dissertation, The London School of Economics and Political Science.
    https://etheses.lse.ac.uk/3748/1/Erdem__investigating-the-dynamic.pdf
  • Jennifer Flashman (2009). You've got a friend: Adolescent friendship choices, dynamics, and implications for future stratification. PhD dissertation, UCLA, 2009. (Publication No. AAT 3388161)
    https://gradworks.umi.com/33/88/3388161.htm.
  • Jennifer Flashman (2012). Academic Achievement and Its Impact on Friend Dynamics. Sociology of Education, 85, 61-80.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1177/0038040711417014.
  • Janna Fortuin, Mitch van Geel, and Paul Vedder (2016). Peers and academic achievement: A longitudinal study on selection and socialization effects of in-class friends. Journal of Educational Research, 109, 1-6.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.917257.
  • Janna Fortuin, Mitch van Geel, and Paul Vedder (2015). Peer Influences on Internalizing and Externalizing Problems among Adolescents: A Longitudinal Social Network Analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 887-897.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0168-x.
  • Rob Franken, Hidde Bekhuis and Jochem Tolsma (2023). Kudos make you run! How runners influence each other on the online social network Strava. Social Networks, 72, 151-164.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2022.10.001
    Tests one-sided social influence (one-sided average similarity).
  • Aart Franken, Terrie E. Moffitt, Christian E.G. Steglich, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Zeena Harakeh and Wilma A. M. Vollebergh (2015). The Role of Self-Control and Early Adolescents' Friendships in the Development of Externalizing Behavior: The SNARE Study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 9, 1800-1811.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0287-z.
  • Aart Franken, Loes Keijsers, Jan K. Dijkstra and Tom ter Bogt (2017). Music Preferences, Friendship, and Externalizing Behavior in Early Adolescence: A SIENA Examination of the Music Marker Theory Using the SNARE Study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 1839-1850.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0633-4
  • Katrien Fransen, Ellen Delvaux, Batja Mesquita and Stef Van Puyenbroeck (2018). The Emergence of Shared Leadership in Newly Formed Teams With an Initial Structure of Vertical Leadership: A Longitudinal Analysis. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54, 140-170.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886318756359
  • Tobias Frey and Thomas N. Friemel (2012). Network dynamics of television use in school classes. Social Networks, 34, 346-358.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.08.002.
  • Tobias Frey and Thomas N. Friemel (2023). Adolescents' Drinking Behavior Off- and Online: Disentangling Exposure Effects and Selective Exposure in Networked Communication Structures Journal of Health Communication, 28, 815-824.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2023.2275124.
  • Fabrizio Fusillo, Francesco Quatraro and Stefano Usai (2022). Going green: Environmental regulation, eco-innovation and technological alliances. Economics Of Innovation And New Technology (31), 362–386.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1799143
  • Sarah Evelyn Gardner (2019). Coping with school-based peer-victimisation: The role of peers. Doctoral Thesis
  • Gesell, Sabina B. and Tesdahl, Eric and Ruchman, Eileen (2012). The Distribution of Physical Activity in an After-school Friendship Network. Pediatrics, 129, 1064-1071.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/10.1542/peds.2011-2567.
  • Sara Geven, Jeroen Weesie, and Frank van Tubergen (2013). The influence of friends on adolescents' behavior problems at school: The role of ego, alter and dyadic characteristics. Social Networks, 35, 583-592.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.08.002
  • Sara Geven, Jan O. Jonsson, and Frank van Tubergen (2017). Gender differences in resistance to schooling: the role of dynamic peer-influence and selection processes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 2421-2445.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0696-2
  • Matteo Giletta, Ron H. J. Scholte, Mitchell J. Prinstein, Rutger C. M. E. Engels, Emanuela Rabaglietti, and William J. Burk (2012). Friendship Context Matters: Examining the Domain Specificity of Alcohol and Depression Socialization Among Adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 1027-1043. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9625-8.
  • Matteo Giletta, William J. Burk, Ron H. J. Scholte, Rutger C. M. E. Engels and Mitchell J. Prinstein (2013). Direct and Indirect Peer Socialization of Adolescent Nonsuicidal Self-Injury. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 450-463.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12036.
  • James N. Greenwell (2016). Actor-based Models of Substance Use in Adolescent Social Networks: Unravelling complex drivers of behavior. PhD Thesis, The University of Auckland (New Zealand). https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/28326.
  • Danica Vukadinovic Greetham, Robert Hurling, Gabrielle Osborne, and Alex Linley (2011). Social Networks and Positive and Negative Affect. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 22, 4-13.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.051
  • Mariola C. Gremmen, Christian Berger, Allison M. Ryan, Christian E. G. Steglich, René Veenstra and Jan K. Dijkstra (2018). Adolescents' Friendships, Academic Achievement, and Risk Behaviors: Same-Behavior and Cross-Behavior Selection and Influence Processes. Child Development, 90 (2), e192-e211.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13045
  • Mariola C. Gremmen, Jan K. Dijkstra, Christian Steglich and René Veenstra (2017). First Selection, then Influence: Developmental Differences in Friendship Dynamics Regarding Academic Achievement. Developmental Psychology, 53, 1356-1370.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000314
  • Mariola C. Gremmen, Yvonne H. M. van den Berg, Christian Steglich, René Veenstra and Jan Kornelis Dijkstra (2018). The importance of near-seated peers for elementary students' academic engagement and achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 57, 42-52.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.04.004
  • Steven A. Haas and David R. Schaefer (2014). With a little help from my friends? Asymmetrical social influence on adolescent smoking initiation and cessation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 55, 126-143.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022146514532817.
  • Mirjam Hazenbosch, Shen Sui, Brus Isua, Emilie Beauchamp, Alfred Kik, Grace Luke, Petr Matous, Rebecca J. Morris, Jason Paliau, E. J. Milner-Gulland (2022). Quantifying unintended effects of an agroecological research project on farmers' practices and social network in Papua New Guinea. People and Nature, 4, 1592-1602.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10404.
  • Dana L. Haynie, Nathan J. Doogan, and Brian Soller, (2014). Gender, Friendship Networks, And Delinquency: A Dynamic Network Approach. Criminology, 52, 688-722.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12052.
  • Yuan Hsiao, Ching-Ling Cheng and Ya-Wen Ciu (2019). Gender network dynamics in prosocial and aggressive behavior of early adolescents. Social Networks, 58, 12-23.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.01.002
  • Grace C. Huang, Daniel Soto, Kayo Fujimoto, and Thomas W. Valente (2014). The Interplay of Friendship Networks and Social Networking Sites: Longitudinal Analysis of Selection and Influence Effects on Adolescent Smoking and Alcohol Use. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 8, e51-e59.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302038.
  • Chip Huisman (2014). Does it matter what friends think, say, or do? The role of friends' smoking attitudes and behavior for Dutch adolescents' smoking behavior. Substance Use & Misuse, 49, 715-723.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2013.863347.
  • Chip Huisman and Jeroen Bruggeman (2012). The social network, socioeconomic background, and school type of adolescent smokers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36, 329-337.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025412444078
  • Edmund R. Hunt, Brian Mi, Camila Fernandez, Brandyn M. Wong, Jonathan N. Pruitt and Noa Pinter-Wollman (2018). Social interactions shape individual and collective personality in social spiders. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 285.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1366
  • Leonard A. Jason, Gabrielle Lynch, Ted Bobak, John M. Light, and Nathan J. Doogan (2022). Dynamic interdependence of advice seeking, loaning, and recovery characteristics in recovery homes. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 32:5, 663-678.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2021.1947930
  • Welsey Jeffrey (2024). Ranking and Sorting: An Examination of Positional and Relational Dynamics in Higher Education. UC Irvine Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
  • Jinhan Jiao (2022). Dynamics of interpersonal trust: a social network perspective.
    PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen.
  • Rupa Jose, John R. Hipp, Carter T. Butts, Cheng Wang, and Cynthia M. Lakon (2016). Network Structure, Influence, Selection, and Adolescent Delinquent Behavior: Unpacking a Dynamic Process. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 264-284.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093854815605524
  • Philipp Jugert, Lars Leszczensky, and Sebastian Pink (2020). Differential Influence of Same- and Cross-Ethnic Friends on Ethnic-Racial Identity Development in Early Adolescence. Child Development, 91, 949-963.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13240
  • Yuval Kalish, Gil Luria, Sharon Toker, and Mina Westman (2015). Till Stress Do Us Part. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1737-1751.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000023
  • David Kavaler and Vladimir Filkov (2016). Stochastic actor-oriented modeling for studying homophily and social influence in OSS projects. Empirical Software Engineering, 22, 407-435.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9431-y
  • Margaret Kerr, Maarten Van Zalk, and Håkan Stattin (2012). Psychopathic traits moderate peer influence on adolescent delinquency. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 826-835.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02492.x
  • Thoa V. Khuu, David R. Schaefer, Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor, and Allison M. Ryan (2023). The Limitations of Intergroup Friendship: Using Social Network Analysis to Test the Pathways Linking Contact and Intergroup Attitudes in a Multigroup Context. Socius9: 1-25.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23780231231161048
  • Jin-Gu Kim and Jin-Iee Park (2018). Exploring Peer Dynamics on Aggression and social status types in a 1st grade elementary school setting: A longitudinal social network analysis. International Journal of Early Childhood Education, 24, special issues, 115-131.
    (the link is here too long to be given in text)
  • Jin-Gu Kim, Yun-Jeong Shin, and Daeun Park (2023). Peer network in math anxiety: A longitudinal social network approach. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 232, 10567253
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105672
  • Martin Kindschi, Jan Cieciuch, Eldad Davidov, Alexander Ehlert, Heiko Rauhut, Claudio Juan Tessone and René Algesheimer (2019). Values in adolescent friendship networks. Network Science, 7(4), 498-522.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2019.16
  • Noona Kiuru, William J. Burk, Brett Laursen, Katariina Salmela-Aro, and Jari-Erik Nurmi (2010). Pressure to drink but not to smoke: Disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 801-812.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.07.006
  • Noona Kiuru, Dawn DeLay, Brett Laursen, William J. Burk, Marja-Kriistina Lerkkanen, Anna-Maija Poikkeus and Jari-Erik Nurmi (2017). Peer selection and influence on children's reading skills in early primary grades: a social network approach. Reading and Writing, 30, 1473-1500.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9733-5
  • Noona Kiuru, Petri Koivisto, Pertti Mutanen, Jukka Vuori, Jari-Erik Nurmi (2011). How Do Efforts to Enhance Career Preparation Affect Peer Groups? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 679-690.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00701.x
  • Noona Kiuru, William J. Burk, Brett Laursen, Jari-Erik Nurmi, and Katariina Salmela-Aro (2012). Is Depression Contagious? A Test of Alternative Peer Socialization Mechanisms of Depressive Symptoms in Adolescent Peer Networks. Journal of Adolescent Health 50, 250-255.
  • Olga Kornienko, Marissa Davila and Carlos E. Santos (2019). Friendship network dynamics of agressive and rule-breaking antisocial behaviors in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(10), 2065-2078.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01109-9
  • Olga Kornienko, Thomas J. Dishion and Thao Ha (2017). Peer Network Dynamics and the Amplification of Antisocial to Violent Behavior Among Young Adolescents in Public Middle Schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426617742345
  • Olga Kornienko, Thao Ha and Thomas J. Dishion (2020). Dynamic pathways between rejection and antisocial behavior in peer networks: Update and test of confluence model. Development and Psychopathology, 32, 175-188.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579418001645
  • Olga Kornienko, Carlos E. Santos, Eleanor K. Seaton, Marissa Davila, and Pamela W. Garner (2023). Racial Discrimination Experiences and Friendship Network Dynamics Among Black and Latinx Youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52, 685-700.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01746-1
  • Derek A. Kreager, David R. Schaefer, Kimberly M. Davidson, Gary Zajac, Dana L. Haynie and George De Leon (2019). Evaluating peer-influence processes in a prison-based therapeutic community: A dynamic network approach. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 203, 13-18.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.05.018
  • David Kretschmer, Lars Leszczensky and Sebastian Pink (2018). Selection and influence processes in academic achievement: More pronounced for girls? Social Networks, 52, 251-260.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.09.003
  • Heike Krüger and Robert Krause (2023). Co-Development of Group Integration, Loneliness, and Mental Health within the School Context PsyArXiv, 70, 64-76.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.31234/OSF.IO/JP3DZ
  • Hanno Kruse and Clemens Kroneberg (2022). Contextualizing oppositional cultures: The variable significance of gender and ethnic minority status across schools. Social Networks, 70, 64-76.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2021.11.004
  • Cynthia M. Lakon, John R. Hipp, Cheng Wang, Carter T. Butts, and Rupa Jose (2015). Simulating Dynamic Network Models and Adolescent Smoking: The Impact of Varying Peer Influence and Peer Selection. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 2438-2448.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302789
  • Cynthia M. Lakon, Cheng Wang, Carter T. Butts, Rupa Jose and John R. Hipp (2017). Cascades of emotional support in friendship networks and adolescent smoking. PloS One, 12, e0180204.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180204
  • Cynthia M. Lakon, Cheng Wang, Carter T. Butts, Rupa Jose, David S. Timberlake, and John R. Hipp (2014). A Dynamic Model of Adolescent Friendship Networks, Parental Influences, and Smoking. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1-20.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0187-7
  • Lambe, L. J., & Craig, W. M. (2022). The co-evolution of friendship, defending behaviors, and peer victimization: A short-term longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development, in press.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12599
  • Landis, Blaine, Jon M. Jachimowicz, Dan J. Wang, and Robert W. Krause (2022). Revisiting extraversion and leadership emergence: A social network churn perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123, 811-829.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000410
  • Lydia Laninga-Wijnen, Mariola C. Gremmen, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, René Veenstra, Wilma A. M. Vollebergh and Zeena Harakeh (2018). The role of academic status norms in friendship selection and influence processes related to academic achievement. Developmental Psychology, 55(2), 337-350.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000611
  • Lydia Laninga-Wijnen, Zeena Harakeh, Christian Steglich, Jan K. Dijkstra, René Veenstra, and Wilma Vollebergh (2017). The Norms of Popular Peers Moderate Friendship Dynamics of Adolescent Aggression. Child Development, 88, 1265-1283.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12650
  • Lydia Laninga-Wijnen, Christian Steglich, Zeena Harakeh, Wilma Vollebergh, René Veenstra and Jan Kornelis Dijkstra (2019). The role of prosocial and aggressive popularity norm combinations in prosocial and aggressive friendship processes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01088-x
  • Brett Laursen, Danielle Pop, William J. Burk, Margaret Kerr, and Håkan Stattin (2008). Incorporating interdependence into developmental research: Examples from the study of homophily and heterogeneity. In: Noel A. Card, James P. Selig, and Todd D. Little, Modeling Dyadic and Interdependent Data in the Developmental and Behavioral Sciences. New York and London: Routledge, p. 11-37.
  • Sang Yup Lee, Homophily and social influence among online casual game players (2015). Telematics and Informatics, 32, 656-666.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.02.007
  • Chih-Ting Lee, Tsai-Wei Chen, Josue Jaru Ubeda Herrera, Yi-Fang Yu, Carol Strong, Chung-Ying Lin, Yun-Hsuan Chang, Yi-Ping Hsieh, Yi-Ching Lin, and Meng-Che Tsai (2022). Dynamic weight status changes and peer lifestyles in early adolescence: A social network analysis on a longitudinal cohort of Taiwanese youth. Obesity Research and Clinical Practice, in press.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2022.10.004
  • Chih-Ting Lee, Tsai-Wei Chen, Yi-Fang Yu, Carol Strong, Chung-Ying Lin, Yun-Hsuan Chang, Yi-Ping Hsieh, Yi-Ching Lin, Josue Jaru Ubeda Herrera, and Meng-Che Tsai (2022). Reciprocal Peer Network Processes on Substance Use and Delinquent Behavior in Adolescence: Analysis from a Longitudinal Youth Cohort Study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, in press.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-022-00904-z
  • Sven Lenkewitz (2022, December 10). Social networks, cultural capital, and educational inequality: Investigating network mechanisms and differences in academic achievement. SocArXiv, 10 Dec. 2022.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/n4wmf
  • Lars Leszczensky and Sebastian Pink (2015). Ethnic segregation of friendship networks in school: Testing a rational-choice argument of differences in ethnic homophily between classroom- and grade-level networks. Social Networks, 42, 18-26.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.02.002
  • Lars Leszczensky and Sebastian Pink (2017). Intra- and Inter-group Friendship Choices of Christian, Muslim, and Non-religious Youth in Germany. European Sociological Review, 33, 72-83.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw049
  • Lars Leszczensky, Tobias H. Stark, Andreas Flache, and Anke Munniksma (2015). Disentangling the relation between young immigrants' host country identification and their friendships with natives. Social Networks, 44, 179-189.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.08.001.
  • Kevin Lewis (2011). The co-evolution of social network ties and online privacy behavior. Pp. 91-109 in Privacy Online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-Disclosure in the Social Web, Part 1, edited by S. Trepte and L. Reinecke. Heidelberg and New York: Springer.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_8.
  • Kevin Lewis, Marco Gonzalez, and Jason Kaufman (2012). Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. PNAS 109, 68-72.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109739109
  • Shihan Li, David Krackhardt, and Nynke M. D. Niezink (2023). Do Your Friends Stress You Out? A Field Study of the Spread of Stress Through a Community Network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100-116.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000415.
  • John M. Light, Thomas J. Dishion (2007). Early adolescent antisocial behavior and peer rejection: A dynamic test of a developmental process. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 118, 77-89.
  • John M. Light, Charlotte C. Greenan, Julie C. Rushby, Kimberly M. Nies, and Tom A.B. Snijders (2013). Onset to First Alcohol Use in Early Adolescence: A Network Diffusion Model. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 487-499.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12064.
  • John M. Light, Julie C. Rushby, Kimberly M. Nies, and Tom A.B. Snijders (2014). Antisocial behavior trajectories and social victimization within and between school years in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24, 322-336.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12055.
  • John M. Light, Kathryn L. Mills, Julie C. Rusby and Erika Westling (2019). Friend selection and influence effects for first heavy drinking episode in adolescence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 80(3), 349-357.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2019.80.349
  • Handrea A. Logis, Philip C. Rodkin, Scott D. Gest and Hai-Jeong Ahn (2013). Popularity as an Organizing Factor of Preadolescent Friendship Networks: Beyond Prosocial and Aggressive Behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 413-423.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12033
  • Gerine M.A. Lodder, Ron H.J. Scholte, Antonius H.N. Cillessen, and Matteo Giletta (2016). Bully Victimization: Selection and Influence Within Adolescent Friendship Networks and Cliques. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 132-144.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0343-8
  • Alessandro Lomi, Tom A.B. Snijders, Christian E.G. Steglich, and Vanina Jasmine Torló (2011). Why Are Some More Peer Than Others? Evidence from a Longitudinal Study of Social Networks and Individual Academic Performance. Social Science Research, 40, 1506-1520.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.010.
  • Emily Long (2018). Using social network analysis to examine the intersection of adolescent friendships and health behavior. Doctoral Dissertation, Utah State University. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations 7084.
    https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7084
  • Emily Long and Thomas W. Valente (2019). Perceived social acceptability and longitudinal trends in adolescent cigarette smoking. Prevention Science, 20, 824-832.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0945-y
  • Emily Long, Tyson S. Barrett and Ginger Lockhart (2017). Network-Behavior Dynamics of Adolescent Friendships, Alcohol Use, and Physical Activity. Health Psychology, 36, 577-586.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000483
  • Beata Lopaciuk-Gonczaryk (2019). Social capital formation through a polish LETS: Challenging the presumed merits of local currencies. Ecological Economics, 158, 75-87.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.004
  • Ashlyn Paige Lowe (2022). Understanding Teamwork Using Dynamic Network Models. DePaul University, College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations, 413.
  • Miranda J. Lubbers, Tom A.B. Snijders, and Margaretha P.C. van der Werf (2011). Dynamics of Peer Relationships Across the First Two Years of Junior High as a Function of Gender and Changes in Classroom Composition. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 488-504.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00688.x .
  • Jinwen Luo, Minjeong Jeon, Minho Lee, Eric Ho, Angela Fidler Pfammatter, Vivek Shetty, and Bonnie Spring (2022). Relationships between changing communication networks and changing perceptions of psychological safety in a team science setting: Analysis with actor-oriented social network models. PLOS ONE 17(8): e0273899.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273899.
  • Cassie McMillan,, Brandon Craig, Chaïm la Roi, and René Veenstra (2023). Adolescent friendship, cross-sexuality ties, and attitudes toward sexual minorities: A social network approach to intergroup contact. Social Science Research, 114, 102916.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102916.
  • Mark S. Manger and Mark A. Pickup (2016). The Coevolution of Trade Agreement Networks and Democracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 60, 164-191.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002714535431 .
  • Carol L. Martin, Olga Kornienko, David R. Schaefer, Laura D. Hanish, Richard A. Fabes and Priscilla Goble (2013). The Role of Sex of Peers and Gender-Typed Activities in Young Children's Peer Affiliative Networks: A Longitudinal Analysis of Selection and Influence. Child Development, 84, 921-937.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12032
  • Cécile Mathys, William J. Burk and Antonius H. N. Cillessen (2013). Popularity as a Moderator of Peer Selection and Socialization of Adolescent Alcohol, Marijuana, and Tobacco Use. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 513-523.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12031.
  • Petr Matous and Yasuyuki Todo (2015). Exploring dynamic mechanisms of learning networks for resource conservation. Ecology and Society 20(2): 36.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07602-200236.
  • Petr Matous and Yasuyuki Todo (2017). Analyzing the coevolution of interorganizational networks and organizational performance: Automakers' production networks in Japan. Applied Network Science, 2, 5.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-017-0024-5
  • Petr Matous, Yasuyuki Todo And Tatsuya Ishikawa (2014). Emergence of multiplex mobile phone communication networks across rural areas: An Ethiopian experiment. Network Science, 2, 162-188.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/nws.2014.12
  • Rebecca L. Mauldin (2018). The Dynamics of Social Networks and Health in an Assisted Living Facility. PhD dissertation, Graduate College of Social Work of the University of Houston.
    URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10657/3160
  • Cassie McMillan, Diane Felmlee and D. Wayne Osgood (2018). Peer influence, friend selection, and gender: How network processes shape adolescent smoking, drinking, and delinquency. Social Networks, 55, 86-96.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.05.008
  • Cassie McMillan and Brittany N. Freelin (2023). School Transitions, Peer Processes, and Delinquency: A Social Network Approach to Turning Points in Adolescence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, in press.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278231167841
  • Jingbo Meng (2016). Your Health Buddies Matter: Preferential Selection and Social Influence on Weight Management in an Online Health Social Network. Health Communication, 31, 1460-1471.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1079760
  • Sterett H. Mercer and Melissa A. Derosier (2010). Selection and Socialization of Internalizing Problems in Middle Childhood. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 1031-1056.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.9.1031.
  • L. Mercken, J.E. Saul, R.H. Lemaire, T.W. Valente, and S.J. Leischow (2015). Coevolution of Information Sharing and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices Among North American Tobacco Cessation Quitlines. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 1814-1822.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302627.
  • L. Mercken, E.F.C. Sleddens, H. de Vries, and C.E.G. Steglich (2013). Choosing adolescent smokers as friends: The role of parenting and parental smoking. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 383-392.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.004.
  • Loes Meeussen, Filip Agneessens, Ellen Delvaux and Karen Phalet (2018). Ethnic diversity and value sharing: A longitudinal social network perspective on interactive group processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 428-447.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12237
  • Gabriel J. Merrin, Kayla de la Haye, Dorothy L. Espelage, Brett Ewing, Joan S. Tucker, Matthew Hoover and Harold D. Green Jr. (2018). The Co-evolution of Bullying Perpetration, Homophobic Teasing, and a School Friendship Network. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 601-618.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0783-4
  • Emiel de Lange, E.J. Milner-Gulland, and Aidan Keane (2021). Effects of social networks on interventions to change conservation behavior. Conservation Biology, 36(3), e13833.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13833
  • Steffen Mohrenberg (2017). Studying Policy Diffusion with Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models. In: Betina Hollstein, Wenzel Matiaske, and Kai-Uwe Schnapp, Networked Governance: New Research Perspectives, p. 163-188, Cham: Springer.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50386-8_10
  • Andres Molano, Stephanie M. Jones, Joshua L. Brown and J. Lawrence Aber (2013). Selection and Socialization of Aggressive and Prosocial Behavior: The Moderating Role of Social-Cognitive Processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 424-436.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12034
  • Marlon P. Mundt (2013). Social Network Analysis of Peer Effects on Binge Drinking among U.S. Adolescents. In Ariel M. Greenberg, William G. Kennedy, and Nathan D. Bos, Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7812. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37210-0_14.
  • Marlon P. Mundt, Liesbeth Mercken, and Larissa Zakletskaia (2012). Peer selection and influence effects on adolescent alcohol use: a stochastic actor-based model. BMC Pediatrics 2012, 12:115. https://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/12/115.
  • Marlon P. Mundt and Larissa I. Zakletskaia (2019). Adolescent friendship formation and mental health: A stochastic actor-based model of help-seeking behavior. Journal of Social Structure, 20(3), 50-69.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/joss-2019-006
  • Murray, Jennifer M., Sánchez-Franco, Sharon C., Sarmiento, Olga L., et al. (2023). Selection homophily and peer influence for adolescents' smoking and vaping norms and outcomes in high and middle-income settings. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 615.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02124-9
  • Hiromi Nakazato and Seunghoo Lim (2020). Interplay between social support tie formations and subjective mental health conditions in a community currency system in Japanese disaster-affected communities: Double-edged phenomena. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 101809.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101809
  • Reza Yousefi Nooraie, Qiuyuan Qin, Adrian Wagg, Whitney Berta, and Carole Estabrooks (2024). Building a communication and support network among Quality Improvement teams in Nursing Homes: a longitudinal study of the SCOPE trial. Implementation Science Communications, 5, 19.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00559-y
  • Ojanen, T., Sijtsema, J. J., Hawley, P. H., and Little, T. D. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in early adolescents' friendship development: Friendship selection, influence, and prospective friendship quality. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 837-851.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.08.004.
  • Tiina Ojanen, Jelle J. Sijtsema and Ashwin J. Rambaran (2013). Social Goals and Adolescent Friendships: Social Selection, Deselection, and Influence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 550-662.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12043.
  • D. Wayne Osgood, Mark E. Feinberg, and Daniel T. Ragan (2015). Social Networks and the Diffusion of Adolescent Problem Behavior: Reliable Estimates of Selection and Influence from Sixth Through Ninth Grades. Prevention Science, 16, 832-843.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0558-7.
  • D. Wayne Osgood, Daniel T. Ragan, Lacey Wallace, Scott D. Gest, Mark E. Feinberg and James Moody (2013). Peers and the Emergence of Alcohol Use: Influence and Selection Processes in Adolescent Friendship Networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 500-512.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12059.
  • Marie Ouellet, Leah Daigle, and Owen Gallupe (2022). Deviant peers: Does friendship stability condition the peer-delinquency link? European Journal of Criminology, 20, 1123-1145
    DOI: https://dx.doi.orgj10.1177/14773708221128293
  • Mark C. Pachucki, Emily J. Ozer, Alain Barrat, Ciro Cattuto (2015). Mental health and social networks in early adolescence: A dynamic study of objectively-measured social interaction behaviors. Social Science & Medicine 125, 40-50.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.015
    Note: a large negative average similarity effect was found, with a large standard error. The conclusion was that this effect was non-significant. However, it may have been a case of the Donner-Hauck phenomenon (see the manual), where the ratio of parameter estimate to standard error should not be used for the significance test.
    But the negative average similarity effect might also be a sign of model misspecification; this could be investigated using the Snijders-Lomi 5-parameter model (Network Science, 2019).
  • Diego Palacios and Christian Berger (2015). Are good students desirable friends? Evidence for friendship selection among elementary students / ¿Son los buenos estudiantes amigos deseables? Evidencia para la selección de amistad entre estudiantes de educación primaria. Estudios de Psicología: Studies in Psychology, 36, 496-508.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2015.1028729
  • Diego Palacios and Christian Berger (2022). Friends' Influence on Academic Performance Among Early Adolescents: The Role of Social Status. Psykhe (Santiago), 31(1), 1-14.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.2019.21811
  • Birgit Pauksztat (2021). Informal relations and communication about work-related problems in two multilingual crews. Marine Policy, 130, 103767.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103767
  • Andrew Parker, Christian Waldstrøm, and Neha Parikh Shah (2023). The coevolution of emotional job demands and work-based social ties and their effect on performance. Journal of Management , 49, 1601-1632.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221087636
  • Pearson, Michael, Steglich, Christian, and Snijders, Tom (2006). Homophily and assimilation among sport-active adolescent substance users. Connections 27(1), 47-63.
    (Note: the quadratic shape function has mistakenly been omitted from the specification of the behavior objective function in the analyses reported here.)
  • Tuan Phan, Dan Ding, Prasanta Bhattacharya, and Edoardo Airoldi (2021). Impact of Academic Interaction Networks on Grades & Jobs: Evidence from Four-year University Trajectories. PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-646237/v1
  • Sebastian Pink, David Kretschmer and Lars Leszczensky (2020). Choice modelling in social networks using stochastic actor-oriented models. Journal of Choice Modelling, 34.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2020.100202
  • Christina Prell and Kuishuang Feng (2016). The evolution of global trade and impacts on countries' carbon trade imbalances. Social Networks 46, 87-100.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.03.001
  • Emanuela Rabaglietti, William J. Burk, and Matteo Giletta (2012). Regulatory self-efficacy as a moderator of peer socialization relating to Italian adolescents' alcohol intoxication. Social Development, 21, 522-536.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00637.x
  • Márta K. Radó, Dorottya Kisfalusi, Anthony A. Laverty, Frank J. van Lenthe, Jasper V. Been, Károly Takács (2023). Socio-economic inequalities in smoking and drinking in adolescence: Assessment of social network dynamics. Addiction, 119, 488-498.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16384
  • Daniel T. Ragan (2014). Revisiting "what they think": adolescent drinking and the importance of peer beliefs. Criminology, 52, 488-513.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12044
  • Daniel T. Ragan(2016). Peer beliefs and smoking in adolescence: a longitudinal social network analysis. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 42, 222-230.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2015.1119157
  • Daniel T. Ragan (2020). Similarity between deviant peers: Developmental trends in influence and selection. Criminology, 1-34.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12238
  • Daniel T. Ragan, D. Wayne Osgood and Mark E. Feinberg (2014). Friends as a bridge to parental influence: Implications for adolescent alcohol use. Social Forces, 92, 1061-1085.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot117
  • Daniel T. Ragan, D. Wayne Osgood, and Derek A. Kreager (2022). Impulsivity, Peers, and Delinquency: A Dynamic Social Network Approach. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, in press.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-022-09547-8
  • Daniel T. Ragan, D. Wayne Osgood, Nayan G. Ramirez, James Moody and Scott D. Gest (2022). A comparison of peer influence estimates from SIENA Stochastic Actor-based Models and from conventional regression approaches. Sociological Methods and Research, 51, 357-395.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119852369
  • Ashwin J. Rambaran, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra and Tobias H. Stark (2013). Status-Based Influence Processes: The Role of Norm Salience in Contagion of Adolescent Risk Attitudes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 574-585.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12032
  • J. Ashwin Rambaran, Andrea Hopmeyer, David Schwartz, Christian E.G. Steglich, Daryaneh Badaly, and René Veenstra (2016). Academic functioning and peer influences: A short-term longitudinal study of network-behavior dynamics in middle adolescence. Child Development, 88, 523-543.
  • J. Ashwin Rambaran, Hoffman, A. J., Deborah Rivas-Drake, David R. Schaefer, Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor, and Allison M. Ryan (2022). Belonging in diverse contexts: Sociability among same-ethnic and cross-ethnic peers. School Psychology, 37, 467–477.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000480
  • Rambaran, J.A., Van Duijn, M. A. J., Dijkstra, J. K., and Veenstra, R. (2019). Peer victimization in single-grade and multigrade classrooms. Aggressive Behavior, 45, 561-570,
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21851
  • Rayner, Kathryn E., Carolyn A. Schniering, Ronald M. Rapee, Alan Taylor, and Delyse M. Hutchinson (2013). Adolescent girls' friendship networks, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating: Examining selection and socialization processes. Journal Of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 93-104.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1037/a0029304.
  • Lauren Rhue and Arun Sundararajan (2014). Digital access, political networks and the diffusion of democracy. Social Networks, 36, 40-53. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.06.007.
  • Deborah Rivas-Drake, Muniba Saleem, David R. Schaefer, Michael Medina and Robert Jagers (2019). Intergroup contact attitudes across peer networks in school: Selection, influence, and implications for cross-group friendships. Child Development, 90, 1898-1916.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13061
  • Deborah Rivas-Drake, Adriana J Umaña-Taylor, David R Schaefer, and Michael Medina (2017). Ethnic-Racial Identity and Friendships in Early Adolescence. Child Development, 88, 710-724.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12790
  • Kelly L. Rulison, Scott D. Gest and Eric Loken (2013). Dynamic Social Networks and Physical Aggression: The Moderating Role of Gender and Social Status Among Peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 437-449.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12044.
  • Giovanni R. P. Sadewo, Emiko S. Kashima, Colin Gallagher, Yoshihisa Kashima and Johan Koskinen (2020). International students' cross-cultural adjustment: Social selection or social influence? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51(6), 490-510.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022120930092
  • David R. Schaefer (2018). A Network Analysis of Factors Leading Adolescents to Befriend Substance-Using Peers. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34, 275-312.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9335-4.
  • David R. Schaefer, jimi adams, and Steven A. Haas (2013). Social Networks and Smoking: Exploring the Effects of Peer Influence and Smoker Popularity Through Simulations. Health Education and Behavior, 40, no. 1, 24S-32S.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1090198113493091.
  • David R. Schaefer, Steven A. Haas, and Nicholas J. Bishop (2012). A Dynamic Model of US Adolescents' Smoking and Friendship Networks. American Journal of Public Health, 102.6, e12-e18.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300705

  • Mathis Schulte, N. Andrew Cohen, and Katherine J. Klein. The Coevolution of Network Ties and Perceptions of Team Psychological Safety. Organization Science 23 (2012), 564-581.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0582
  • Miranda Sentse, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Christina Salmivalli, and Antonius H. N. Cillessen (2013). The Dynamics of Friendships and Victimization in Adolescence: A Longitudinal Social Network Perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 229-238.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.21469
  • Miranda Sentse, Noona Kiuru, René Veenstra, and Christina Salmivalli (2014). A Social Network Approach to the Interplay Between Adolescents' Bullying and Likeability over Time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1409-1420.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0129-4.
  • Rosaly Severijns, Jasperina Brouwer, Kayla de la Haye, Sandra Streukens, and Sebastien Lizin (2025). The social dynamics of animal product consumption and dietary identity in friendship networks of university students. Food Quality and Preference, in press.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105475.
  • Mengqian Shen(2022). Peer Relationships and Chinese Adolescents' Academic Achievement: Processes of Selection and Influence. PhD Dissertation, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Purdue University Graduate School.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25394/PGS.20075930.v1.
  • Mengqian Shen, Dawn DeLay, Urip Purwono, and Doran C. French (2022). Peer Relationships and Indonesian Muslim Adolescents' Religiosity and Religious Coping: Selection and Influence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, in press.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12787.
  • Mengqian Shen and Doran C. French (2023). Peer Relationships and Chinese Adolescents' Academic Achievement: Selection and Influence (2023). American Educational Research Journal, in press.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312231208675.
  • Huiyoung Shin (2017). Friendship Dynamics of Adolescent Aggression, Prosocial Behavior, and Social Status: The Moderating Role of Gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 2305-2320.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0702-8
  • Huiyoung Shin (2019). The role of perceived bullying norms in friendship dynamics: An examination of friendship selection and influence on bullying and victimization. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1-11.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419868533
  • Huiyoung Shin (2022). Social contagion of academic behavior: Comparing social network peers. PLoS ONE 17(3): e0265385.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265385
  • Huiyoung Shin and Allison M. Ryan (2014). Friendship Networks and Achievement Goals: An Examination of Selection and Influence Processes and Variations by Gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1453-1464.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0132-9.
  • Huiyoung Shin and Allison M. Ryan (2017). Friend influence on early adolescent disruptive behavior in the classroom: Teacher emotional support matters. Developmental Psychology, 53, 114-125.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000250.
  • Huiyoung Shin, Allison M. Ryan and Elizabeth North (2019). Friendship processes around prosocial and aggressive behaviors: The role of teacher-student relatedness and differences between elementary school and middle-school classrooms. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 65(2), 232-263.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar
  • Shoham, D.A., Tong, L., Lamberson, P.J., Auchincloss, A.H., Zhang, J., et al. (2012). An Actor-Based Model of Social Network Influence on Adolescent Body Size, Screen Time, and Playing Sports. PLoS ONE 7(6): e39795.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039795.
  • Michael D. Siciliano, Nienke M. Moolenaar, Alan J. Daly and YiHwa Liou (2017). A Cognitive Perspective on Policy Implementation: Reform Beliefs, Sensemaking, and Social Networks. Public Administration Review, 77, 889-901.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12797
  • Jelle J. Sijtsema and Siegwart M. Lindenberg (2018). Peer influence in the development of adolescent antisocial behavior: Advances from dynamic social network studies. Developmental Review, 50 B, 140-154.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.08.002
  • Jelle J. Sijtsema, Tiina Ojanen, René Veenstra, Siegwart Lindenberg, Patricia H. Hawley, and Todd D. Little (2010). Forms and functions of aggression in adolescent friendship selection and influence: A longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development 19, 515-534.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00566.x.
  • Jelle J. Sijtsema, Ashwin J. Rambaran, and Tiina J. Ojanen (2013). Overt and relational victimization and adolescent friendships: Selection, de-selection, and social influence. Social Influence, 8, 177-195.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.739097.
  • Sijtsema, J.J., Rambaran, J.A., Caravita, S.C.S., and Gini, G. (2014). Friendship Selection and Influence in Bullying and Defending: Effects of Moral Disengagement. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2093-2104.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037145.
  • Melissa Simone, Emily Long and Ginger Lockhart (2018). The Dynamic Relationship between Unhealthy Weight Control and Adolescent Friendships: A Social Network Approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1373-1384.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0796-z
  • Sandra D. Simpkins, David R. Schaefer, Chara D. Price and Andrea E. Vest (2013). Adolescent Friendships, BMI, and Physical Activity: Untangling Selection and Influence Through Longitudinal Social Network Analysis. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 537-549.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2012.00836.x
  • Tobias H. Stark (2015). Understanding the Selection Bias: Social Network Processes and the Effect of Prejudice on the Avoidance of Outgroup Friends. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78, 127-150.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0190272514565252
  • Tobias H. Stark, Lars Leszczensky, and Sebastian Pink (2017). Are there differences in ethnic majority and minority adolescents' friendships preferences and social influence with regard to their academic achievement? Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 20, 475-498.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-017-0766-y
  • Christian Steglich and Andrea Knecht (2014). Studious by association? Effects of teacher's attunement to students' peer relations. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 17.5, 153-170.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0556-8.
  • Christian Steglich, Philip Sinclair, Jo Holliday, Laurence Moore (2012). Actor-based analysis of peer influence in A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial (ASSIST). Social Networks, 34, 359-369.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.07.001
  • Steglich, C.E.G., Snijders, T.A.B. and West, P. (2006), Applying SIENA: An illustrative analysis of the co-evolution of adolescents' friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption. Methodology, 2, 48-56.
    (Note: the quadratic shape function has mistakenly been omitted from the specification of the behavior objective function in the analyses reported here.)
    For a re-analysis, see one of the Practicals at the RSiena scripts page.
  • Karen Stepanyan, Richard Mather, and Roger Dalrymple (2014). Culture, role and group work: A social network analysis perspective on an online collaborative course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 676-693.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12076.
  • Ylva Svensson, William J. Burk, Håkan Stattin, and Margaret Kerr (2012). Peer selection and influence of delinquent behavior of immigrant and nonimmigrant youths: Does context matter? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36, 178-185.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025411434652.
  • Lauree C. Tilton-Weaver, William J. Burk, Margaret Kerr, and Håkan Stattin (2013). Can Parental Monitoring and Peer Management Reduce the Selection or Influence of Delinquent Peers? Testing the Question Using a Dynamic Social Network Approach. Developmental Psychology, 49, 2057-2070.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031854
  • Jose Daniel Teodoro and Christina Prell (2023). Learning to understand: disentangling the outcomes of stakeholder participation in climate change governance. Social Networks, 75, 29-38.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2022.02.006
  • J.V. Tomás-Miquel, J. Capó-I-Vicedo, J. Capó-Vicedo (2022). From a Personal to a More Social View of Students' Academic Performance: The Importance of Peer Selection at University. ICERI2022 Proceedings, pp. 1522-1526.
  • Sarah L. Trinh, Jaemin Lee, Carolyn T. Halpern, and James Moody (2019). Our Buddies, Ourselves: The Role of Sexual Homophily in Adolescent Friendship Networks. Child Development, 90, e132-e147.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13052
  • Troester, C., Parker, A., van Knippenberg, D., and Sahlmueller, B. (2018). The Coevolution of Social Networks and Thoughts of Quitting. Academy of Management Journal, 62, 22-43 .
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0914 https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0914
  • Joan S. Tucker, Kayla de la Haye, David P. Kennedy, Harold D. Green Jr., and Michael S. Pollard (2014). Peer Influence on Marijuana Use in Different Types of Friendships. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54, 67-73.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.025.
  • Ilmo van der Löwe and Brian Parkinson (2014). Relational emotions and social networks. In Christian von Scheve, Mikko Salmela (eds.), Collective Emotions: Perspectives from Psychology, Philosophy, and Sociology, pp. 125-140. Oxford University Press.
  • Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor, Olga Kornienko, Elana R. McDermott & Frosso Motti-Stefanidi (2019). National identity development and friendship network dynamics among immigrant and non-immigrant youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01181-1
  • Loes Van Rijsewijk, Jan Kornelis, Dijkstra, Kim Pattiselanno, Christian E.G. Steglich, and René Veenstra, R. (2016). Who helps whom? Investigating the development of adolescent prosocial relationships. Developmental Psychology, 52, 894-908.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000106
  • Mark J. Van Ryzin, Dawn DeLay, and Thomas J. Dishion (2016). Being well-liked predicts increased use of alcohol but not tobacco in early adolescence. Addictive Behaviors, 53, 168-174.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.10.017
  • Maarten van Zalk and Jaap Denissen (2015). Idiosyncratic versus social consensus approaches to personality: Self-view, perceived, and peer-view similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 121-141.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000035.
  • Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr, Susan T. Branje, Håkan Stattin, and Wim H.J. Meeus (2010). It Takes Three: Selection, Influence, and De-Selection Processes of Depression in Adolescent Friendship Networks. Developmental Psychology, 46, 927-938.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019661.
  • Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr, Susan T. Branje, Håkan Stattin, and Wim H.J. Meeus (2010). Peer Contagion and Adolescent Depression: The Role of Failure Anticipation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39, 837-848.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2010.517164.
  • Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr, Nejra Van Zalk, and Håkan Stattin (2012). Xenophobia and Tolerance Toward Immigrants in Adolescence: Cross-Influence Processes Within Friendships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 79, 499-526.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9694-8.
  • Maarten H. W. van Zalk, Steffen Nestler, Katharina Geukes, Roos Hutteman and Mitja D. Back (2020). The co-development of extraversion and friendships: Bonding and behavioral mechanisms in friendship networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118, 1269-1290.
    DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pspp0000253
  • Maarten H. W. van Zalk and Jaap Denissen (2015). Idiosyncratic versus social consensus approaches to personality: Self-view, perceived, and peer-view similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 121-141.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000035.
  • Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk and Nejra Van Zalk (2015). The Importance of Perceived Care and Connectedness with Friends and Parents for Adolescent Social Anxiety. Journal of Personality, 83, 346-360.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12108.
  • Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk and Nejra Van Zalk (2015). Violent peer influence: The roles of self-esteem and psychopathic traits. Development and Psychopathology, 27, 1077-1088.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579415000693.
  • Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk, Nejra Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr, and Håkan Stattin (2014). Influences Between Online-Exclusive, Conjoint and Offline-Exclusive Friendship Networks: The Moderating Role of Shyness. European Journal of Personality, 28, pages 134-146.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.1895.
  • Nejra Van Zalk, Maarten Van Zalk, Margaret Kerr and Håkan Stattin (2011). Social Anxiety as a Basis for Friendship Selection and Socialization in Adolescents' Social Networks. Journal of Personality, 79, 499-526.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00682.x.
  • René Veenstra, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Christian Steglich and Maarten H. W. Van Zalk (2013). Network-Behavior Dynamics. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 399-412.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12070
  • Geert P. Verheijen, William J. Burk, Sabine E.M.J. Stoltz, Yvonne H.M. van den Berg, and Antonius H.N. Cillessen (2021). A Longitudinal Social Network Perspective on Adolescents' Exposure to Violent Video Games and Aggression. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 24, 24-31.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0776
  • Andrea Vest Ettekal, Brittany Thompson, Olga Kornienko (2022). Examining the Dynamic Interplay of Motivation and Friendships within a Collegiate Extracurricular Activity in the U.S.: The Case of Marching Band. International Journal for Research on Extended Education, 41-58.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3224/ijree.v10i1.04.
  • Cheng Wang, Omar Lizardo and Davis S. Hachen (2020). Neither influence nor selection: Examining coevolution of political orientation and social networks in the NetSense and NetHealth studies. Plos One, 15(5).
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233458
  • Frank Weerman (2011). Delinquent Peers in Context: A Longitudinal Network Analysis of Selection and Influence Effects. Criminology, 49, 253-286.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00223.x
  • Frank M. Weerman, Pamela Wilcox and Christopher J. Sullivan (2017). The Short-Term Dynamics of Peers and Delinquent Behavior: An Analysis of Bi-weekly Changes Within a High School Student Network. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1-33.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9340-2
  • Nicole van Workum, Ron H. J. Scholte, Antonius H. N. Cillessen, Gerine M. A. Lodder and Matteo Giletta (2013). Selection, Deselection, and Socialization Processes of Happiness in Adolescent Friendship Networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 563-573.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12035.
  • Cheng Wang, John R. Hipp, Carter T. Butts, Rupa Jose, Cynthia M. Lakon (2015). Alcohol Use among Adolescent Youth: The Role of Friendship Networks and Family Factors in Multiple School Studies. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0119965.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119965
  • Cheng Wang, John R. Hipp, Carter T. Butts and Cynthia M. Lakon (2018). The interdependence of cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use in the context of schoolbased social networks. PloS ONE, 13(7): e0200904.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200904
  • Ming-Te Wang, Noona Kiuru, Jessica L. Degol and Katariina Salmela-Aro (2018). Friends, academic achievement, and school engagement during adolescence: A social network approach to peer influence and selection effects. Learning and Instruction, 58, 148-160.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.06.003
  • Yinghuan Wang, Jingjing Zhang, Yan Yan, and Jiancheng Guan (2024). The bidirectional causality of tie stability and innovation performance, Research Policy 53, 105102.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105102
  • Zebing Wu (2015). Adolescent friendship network and college enrollment: a longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence processes. PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) thesis, University of Iowa, 2015.
  • Hsieh-Hua Yang and Chyi-In Wu (2015). Evolution Model of Adolescent Friendship Networks and BMI. In Proceedings of the ASE BigData & SocialInformatics 2015 (ASE BD&SI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 18.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2818869.2818917
  • Panpan Yang, Gangmin Xu, Siman Zhao, Dan Li, Junsheng Liu, and Xinyin Chen (2021). Shyness and Psychological Maladjustment in Chinese Adolescents: Selection and Influence Processes in Friendship Networks. Jounal of Youth and Adolescence 50, 2108–2121.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01415-1
  • DaSean L. Young (2023). Racial Dynamics and Psychosocial Outcomes of Marching Arts Participation. PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) thesis, George Mason University. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (2827397799).
  • Lin Yu, Wenbin Lu and Danyang Huang (2020). Modeling and estimation of contagion-based social network dependence with time-to-event data. Statistica Sinica 2051-2074.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5705/ss.202018.0222.
  • Yi-Fang Yu, Te-Tien Ting, Jay Chiehen Liao, Meng-Che Tsai, Chung-Ying Lin, Yi-Ping Hsieh and Carol Strong (2022). The dynamics of adolescents' pubertal maturation, depressive symptoms and friendship networks: stochastic actor-oriented model. Current Psychology.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04078-8
  • Zhengang Zhang and Taiye Luo (2020). Network capital, exploitative and exploratory innovations--from the perspective of network dynamics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 1-9.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119910
  • Xin Zhang, Eva M. Pomerantz, Lili Qin, Handrea Logis, Allison M. Ryan and Meifang Wang (2019). Early adolescent social status and academic engagement: Selection and influence processes in the United States and China. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(7), 1300-1316.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000333.
  • Jun Zhang, David A. Shoham, Eric Tesdahl, and Sabina B. Gesell (2015). Network Interventions on Physical Activity in an Afterschool Program: An Agent-Based Social Network Study. American Journal of Public Health 105, No. S2, S236-S243.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302277
  • Gennady Zavyalov (2018). Analyzing the Dynamic Interdependence of Network Structure and Performance in Board Interlocks. Chapter 4: Performance Implications of Board Interlocks.
    PhD Thesis UiS no. 414, University of Stavanger.
  • Franziska Zuber (2015). Spread of Unethical Behavior in Organizations: A Dynamic Social Network Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 131, 151-172.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2270-0


Articles about Multilevel (Multi-Group) Analysis of Network and Behavior Dynamics



Articles about two-mode networks.

   Articles about two-mode networks, without a one-mode network

  • Richard A. Benton (2016). Corporate governance and nested authority: Cohesive network structure, actor-driven mechanisms, and the balance of power in American corporations. American Journal of Sociology, 122, 661-713.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/689397

    Note: this article contains a study of the co-evolution of a two-mode network (firms by directors) and 'behavior' (governance index).

  • Guido Conaldi, Alessandro Lomi and Marco Tonellato (2012). Dynamic models of affiliation and the network structure of problem solving in an open source software project. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 385-412.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428111430541.
  • Colin Gallagher, Dean Lusher, Johan Koskinen, Bopha Roden, Peng Wang, Aaron Gosling, Anastasios Polyzos, Martina Stenzel, Sarah Hegarty, Thomas Spurling, and Gregory Simpson (2023). Network patterns of university-industry collaboration: A case study of the chemical sciences in Australia. Scientometrics, 128, 4559-4588.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04749-8
  • Johan Koskinen and Christopher Edling (2012). Modelling the evolution of a bipartite network - Peer referral in interlocking directorates.
    Social Networks, 34, 309-322.
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.001.

  • Alessandro Lomi, Guido Conaldi, Marco Tonellato, Francesca Pallotti (2014). Participation motifs and the emergence of organization in open productions, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 29, 40-57.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.01.002
  • Harald Waxenecker and Christina Prell (2024). Corruption dynamics in public procurement: A longitudinal network analysis of local construction contracts in Guatemala, Social Networks, 79, 154-167.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2024.07.001
  • Minghong Xu and Siddhartha Bhattacharyya (2021). Taste transitivity for collaborative filtering: A stochastic network dynamics approach. Decision Sciences, 52, 629-660.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12347

   Articles about two-mode networks co-evolving with a one-mode network

   (Some papers about multilevel one-mode - two-mode co-evolution models are in the section on articles about Multilevel Multivariate Network Models.)



Multivariate and valued networks

Research articles

Articles about Multilevel (Multi-Group) Analysis of Multivariate Network Dynamics
  • Ana Bravo, Robert W. Krause, Rosario Ortega-Ruiz, and Eva M. Romera (2024). How adolescents' popularity perceptions change: Measuring interactions between popularity and friendship networks. Social Networks, 78, 12-24.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2023.10.004
    Multivariate and also multilevel (uses sienaBayes).
  • Zsófia Boda (2018). Social Influence on Observed Race. Sociological Science, 5, 29-57.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15195/v5.a3
    Multivariate and also multilevel (uses sienaBayes).
  • Zsófia Boda, Bálint Néray, and Tom A. B. Snijders (2020). The Dynamics of Interethnic Friendships and Negative Ties in Secondary School: The Role of Peer-Perceived Ethnicity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 83, 342-362.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0190272520907594
    Multivariate and also multilevel (uses sienaBayes).
  • Dorottya Kisfalusi, Károly Takács, and Judit Pál (2019). Gossip and reputation in adolescent networks. In: F. Giardini & R. Wittek (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation. Oxford University Press, 359-379.
  • Johan Koskinen and Tom A.B. Snijders (2023). Multilevel longitudinal analysis of social networks.
    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 186, 376–400.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnac009
    This paper contains an application to a study of the coevolution of a one-mode friendship network and a two-mode network of delinquent behaviors.
  • Isabel J. Raabe, Zsófia Boda and Christoph Stadtfeld (2019). The social pipeline: How friend influence and peer exposure widen the STEM gender gap. Sociology of Education, 92, 105-123.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040718824095
    (Uses sienaBayes.)
  • Loes G.M. van Rijsewijk, Tom A.B. Snijders, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Christian E.G. Steglich, and René Veenstra (2020). The Interplay Between Adolescents' Friendships and the Exchange of Help: A Longitudinal Multiplex Social Network Study. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30, 63-77.
    (Uses sienaBayes).
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111//jora.12501
  • Huiyoung Shin (2021). The co-evolution of friend and help relationships and their different relationship formation and social influence. Scientific Reports, 13:15974.
    (Uses sienaBayes).
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43346-w
  • Michael Windzio and Patrick Kaminski (2023). The dynamics of 'intergenerational closure' and family networks of social cohesion. Frontiers in Sociology, 8.
    (Uses sienaBayes).
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.933216
Articles about Analysis of Multivariate Multilevel Network Dynamics
  • Alejandro Espinosa-Rada, Elisa Bellotti, Martin G. Everett, and Christoph Stadtfeld (2024). Co-evolution of a socio-cognitive scientific network: A case study of citation dynamics among astronomers. Social Networks, 78, 92-108.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2023.11.008


Articles about Stationary SAOMS ('Stationary Stochastic Actor-oriented Models')

  • Elisa Bellotti, András Vörös, Mattimi Passah, Quinnie Doreen Nongrum, Carinthia Balabet Nengnong, Charishma Khongwir, Annemieke van Eijk, Anne Kessler, Rajiv Sarkar, Jane M. Carlton, Sandra Albert (2023). Social network and household exposure explain the use of malaria prevention measures in rural communities of Meghalaya, India. medRxiv 2023.04.23.23288997.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.23.23288997
    (Co-evolution of a one-mode and a two-mode network; multilevel analysis of 10 village networks.)
  • Cohen R. Simpson (2022). Social Support and Network Formation in a Small-Scale Horticulturalist Population. Scientific Data 9, 570.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01516-x
  • András Vörös, Elisa Bellotti, Carinthia Balabet Nengnong, Mattimi Passah, Quinnie Doreen Nongrum, Charishma Khongwir, Anna Maria van Eijk, Anne Kessler, Rajiv Sarkar, Jane M. Carlton, and Sandra Albert (2025). A multilevel social network approach to studying multiple disease-prevention behaviors. Scientific Reports 1718, 15(1).
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85240-7
    (Co-evolution of a one-mode and a two-mode network; multilevel analysis of 10 village networks. Revised version of Bellotti et al. (2023) listed above.)




Articles about exponential random graph models



In Chinese: Dynamics of networks and behavior.




In Dutch: Dynamics of networks and behavior.




In French: Dynamics of networks

In French: exponential random graph models



In Hungarian: Dynamics of multivariate networks.

  • Dorottya Kisfalusi and Károly Takács (2018). A pletyka és a reputáció összefüggései középiskolai osztályközösségekben. Szociológiai Szemle, 28(1), 83-104.
    https://real.mtak.hu/80872/1/83_104.pdf



In Russian: Dynamics of networks and behavior.



In Spanish: Tutorial articles

In Spanish: Dynamics of networks

In Spanish: Dynamics of personal networks

  • Isidro Maya Jariego, Daniel Holgado Ramos and Miranda J. Lubbers (2018) Efectos de la estructura de las redes personales en la red sociocentrica de una cohorte de estudiantes en transicion de la ensenanza secundaria a la universidad. Universitas Psychological, 17(1), 1-12.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-1.eerp.

In Spanish: Dynamics of networks and behavior

  • Diego Palacios and Christian Berger (2015). Are good students desirable friends? Evidence for friendship selection among elementary students / ¿Son los buenos estudiantes amigos deseables? Evidencia para la selección de amistad entre estudiantes de educación primaria. Estudios de Psicología: Studies in Psychology, 36, 496-508.
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2015.1028729.



In Italian: Dynamics of networks




Back to the main Siena page