Description students data sets van de Bunt
This data set was collected by Gerhard van de Bunt, and is discussed extensively in van de Bunt (1999) and van de Bunt, van Duijn, and Snijders (1999). It is used as example in the manual and in various methodological articles about SIENA.
Download the data set.
The data were collected among a group of university freshmen who, except for a few existing relationships (acquaintances from a former school), did not know each other at the first measurement (time=t0). The data were collected at 7 time points. The first four time points are three weeks apart, whereas the last three time points are six weeks apart. The original group consisted of 49 students, but due to 'university drop-outs' and after deleting those who did not fill in the questionnaire four or more times, a group was obtained of 32 students for whom almost complete data are available.
The students were asked to rate their relationships on a six point scale, with response categories described as follows.
|Label||Description of the response categories|
|1. Best friendship||Persons whom you would call your 'real' friends|
||Persons with whom you have a good relationship, but whom you do not (yet) consider a 'real' friend|
3. Friendly relationship
||Persons with whom you regularly have pleasant contact during classes. The contact could grow into a friendship|
4. Neutral relationship
||Persons with whom you have not much in common. In case of an accidental meeting the contact is good. The chance of it growing into a friendship is not large|
|0. Unknown person||Persons whom you do not know|
5. Troubled relationship
||Persons with whom you can't get on very well, and with whom you definitely do not want to start a relationship. There is a certain risk of getting into a conflict|
Next to the sociometric data, available individual characteristics are sex, education program, and smoking behavior. Smoking was only allowed in special areas. As a consequence, the 'smokers' had to separate themselves from the 'non-smokers' if they wished to smoke (which they often did during coffee and lunch breaks). Thus, contact opportunities differed between actors because of their smoking behavior. The education program was important because, although all started to study at the same moment, there were three groups, following different courses. During the first months all programs overlapped largely, but after a few months, the programs diverged. Especially the 2-year program was quite different from the other two programs. Therefore, this attribute also gives information on the individuals' contact opportunities.
The digraph data files
The networks are coded as 0 = unknown, 1 = best friend, 2 = friend,
3 = friendly relation, 4 = neutral, 5 = troubled relation, 6 = item
non-response, 9 = actor non-response. Note that 6 and 9 are
missing data codes.
The actor attributes are in the file
are, respectively, gender (1 = F, 2 = M), program (2-year, 3-year, 4-year),
(1 = yes, 2 = no). See the references mentioned above for further
information about this network and the actor attributes.
Back to the Siena data sets page